On 5/29/23 10:07, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
Hi,
I think if you retain the stm32mp151.dtsi { port { #address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>; }; }; part, then you wouldn't be getting any warnings
regarding LTDC , and you wouldn't have to remove the unit-address from
endpoint@0 .
btw. I do use
On 5/26/23 18:55, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/25/23 10:14, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Marek,
>
>>> I think if you retain the stm32mp151.dtsi { port { #address-cells =
>>> <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <0>; }; }; part, then you wouldn't be getting any warnings
>>> regarding LTDC , and you
On 5/25/23 10:14, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
Hi,
I think if you retain the stm32mp151.dtsi { port { #address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>; }; }; part, then you wouldn't be getting any warnings
regarding LTDC , and you wouldn't have to remove the unit-address from
endpoint@0 .
btw. I do use
On 5/18/23 01:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/17/23 19:04, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>> Hi Marek
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 5/17/23 17:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 5/17/23 16:35, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
On 5/17/23 19:04, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
Hi Marek
Hi,
On 5/17/23 17:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/17/23 16:35, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
Hi,
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
index 0f1110e42c93..a6e2e20f12fa 100644
---
Hi Marek
On 5/17/23 17:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/17/23 16:35, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
>> index 0f1110e42c93..a6e2e20f12fa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
>>
On 5/17/23 16:35, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
Hi,
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
index 0f1110e42c93..a6e2e20f12fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi
@@ -457,8 +457,7 @@
Several warnings regarding LTDC and DSI on stm32mp15* device-trees remains.
Those concern:
* "#size-cells" and "#address-cells" wrongly used
* residual "reg" property appearing on endpoints where it could be
avoided
* Changed 'panel-dsi@0' to 'panel@0' according to dsi-controller.yaml
