Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Improve clock range handling

Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-02-10 02:19:16) > Hi Stephen, > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is a follow-up of the discussion here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ > > > > and here: > >

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Improve clock range handling

Hi Stephen, On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > This is a follow-up of the discussion here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ > > and here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210914093515.260031-1-max...@cerno.tech/ >

[PATCH v4 00/10] clk: Improve clock range handling

Hi, This is a follow-up of the discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20210319150355.xzw7ikwdaga2dwhv@gilmour/ and here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210914093515.260031-1-max...@cerno.tech/ While the initial proposal implemented a new API to temporarily raise and lower clock rates