On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:54 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>
> On 11/10/2021 10:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:28 AM Akhil P Oommen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/28/2021 6:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> From: Rob Clark
> >>>
> >>> Previously the (non-fd) fence returned from submit
On 11/10/2021 10:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:28 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
On 7/28/2021 6:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark
Previously the (non-fd) fence returned from submit ioctl was a raw
seqno, which is scoped to the ring. But from UABI standpoint, the
ioctls
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:28 AM Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>
> On 7/28/2021 6:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > Previously the (non-fd) fence returned from submit ioctl was a raw
> > seqno, which is scoped to the ring. But from UABI standpoint, the
> > ioctls related to seqno fences
On 7/28/2021 6:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark
Previously the (non-fd) fence returned from submit ioctl was a raw
seqno, which is scoped to the ring. But from UABI standpoint, the
ioctls related to seqno fences all specify a submitqueue. We can
take advantage of that to replace the se
From: Rob Clark
Previously the (non-fd) fence returned from submit ioctl was a raw
seqno, which is scoped to the ring. But from UABI standpoint, the
ioctls related to seqno fences all specify a submitqueue. We can
take advantage of that to replace the seqno fences with a cyclic idr
handle.
Thi
