Hi Greg,
On 19 July 2016 at 17:51, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> (Adding Greg KH)
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 19 July 2016 at 17:45, Sumit Semwal wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>>
>> On 12 July 2016 at 23:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>> From: Gustavo Padovan
>>>
>>> Create sync_file->fence to abstract the type of
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:30:36PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 19 July 2016 at 17:51, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > (Adding Greg KH)
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On 19 July 2016 at 17:45, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 July 2016 at 23:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>
(Adding Greg KH)
Hi Greg,
On 19 July 2016 at 17:45, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>
> On 12 July 2016 at 23:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>> From: Gustavo Padovan
>>
>> Create sync_file->fence to abstract the type of fence we are using for
>> each sync_file. If only one fence is present we
Hi Greg,
On 12 July 2016 at 23:38, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> Create sync_file->fence to abstract the type of fence we are using for
> each sync_file. If only one fence is present we use a normal struct fence
> but if there is more fences to be added to the sync_file a
From: Gustavo Padovan
Create sync_file->fence to abstract the type of fence we are using for
each sync_file. If only one fence is present we use a normal struct fence
but if there is more fences to be added to the sync_file a fence_array
is created.
This change