On 11/29/16 22:26, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jyri,
>
> On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 22:18:25 Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> > The module unload should not be allowed while the bridge is attached. So
>> > still need to add these:
>> >
>> > On 11/25/16 11:02, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>>> > > +
>>> > > +static int tfp4
Hi Jyri,
On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 22:18:25 Jyri Sarha wrote:
> The module unload should not be allowed while the bridge is attached. So
> still need to add these:
>
> On 11/25/16 11:02, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> > +
> > +static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> > +{
> > + struct tfp410 *dv
The module unload should not be allowed while the bridge is attached. So
still need to add these:
On 11/25/16 11:02, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> +
> +static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct tfp410 *dvi = drm_bridge_to_tfp410(bridge);
> + int ret;
> +
+ if (!try_
Add very basic ti-tfp410 DVI transmitter driver. The only feature
separating this from a completely dummy bridge is the EDID read
support trough DDC I2C. Even that functionality should be in a
separate generic connector driver. However, because of missing DRM
infrastructure support the connector is
