On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:13:36PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Niranjana,
...
-static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
+static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool async)
{
if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(>node))
return;
@@ -1725,7 +1727,21 @@ static void
Hi Niranjana,
...
> -static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
> +static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool async)
> {
> if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(>node))
> return;
> @@ -1725,7 +1727,21 @@ static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:52:54PM +, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:53, Niranjana Vishwanathapura
wrote:
Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
async unbind or if async unbind fails.
No need for
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:53, Niranjana Vishwanathapura
wrote:
>
> Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
> Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
> async unbind or if async unbind fails.
>
> No need for vm_unbind out fence support as i915 will internally
> handle
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 05:39:34PM -0800, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 00:52 -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
async unbind or if async unbind fails.
No need for
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 00:52 -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
> Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
> async unbind or if async unbind fails.
>
> No need for vm_unbind out fence support as i915 will internally
>
Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
async unbind or if async unbind fails.
No need for vm_unbind out fence support as i915 will internally
handle all sequencing and user need not try to sequence any
operation with the
