On Tue, 2023-12-26 at 10:11 -0500, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:08:59PM +, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 16:23 -0500, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
alan:snip
> >
> >
> > alan: Thanks Rodrigo for the RB last week, just quick update:
> >
> > I've cant
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:08:59PM +, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 16:23 -0500, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:57:16AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> > > If we are at the end of suspend or very early in resume
> > > its possible an async fence
On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 16:23 -0500, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:57:16AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> > If we are at the end of suspend or very early in resume
> > its possible an async fence signal (via rcu_call) is triggered
> > to free_engines which could lead us to the
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:57:16AM -0800, Alan Previn wrote:
> If we are at the end of suspend or very early in resume
> its possible an async fence signal (via rcu_call) is triggered
> to free_engines which could lead us to the execution of
> the context destruction worker (after a prior worker
If we are at the end of suspend or very early in resume
its possible an async fence signal (via rcu_call) is triggered
to free_engines which could lead us to the execution of
the context destruction worker (after a prior worker flush).
Thus, when suspending, insert rcu_barriers at the start
of
