Re: [RESEND PATCH] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2019-09-23 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:36:25AM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > On 09/09/2019 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get > > resources) as an error. > > > > In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg. > > > >

Re: [RESEND PATCH] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2019-09-12 Thread Steven Price
On 09/09/2019 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get > resources) as an error. > > In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Looks like a good idea, however from what I

[RESEND PATCH] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe

2019-09-09 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get resources) as an error. In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)