Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-03-02 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > On 02/28/2017 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Discussions in previous thread lead us to bisectability problem. >> Bisectability in regular driver changes is one thing but in case of >> driver + DTS the gap is

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-03-01 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
On 02/28/2017 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: Hi All, [Resend this v2 patches, because i have missing TO and CC.] The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. Therefore, the current

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-28 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Hoegeun Kwon wrote: > Hi All, > > [Resend this v2 patches, because i have missing TO and CC.] > > The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. > Therefore, the current dsi_parse_dt function will throw an error,

[RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

2017-02-28 Thread Hoegeun Kwon
Hi All, [Resend this v2 patches, because i have missing TO and CC.] The dsi + panel is a parental relationship, so OF grpah is not needed. Therefore, the current dsi_parse_dt function will throw an error, because there is no linked OF graph for case such as fimd + dsi + panel. So the 1/5 patch