Hi Russell,
On Tuesday, 22 October 2019 15:53:29 BST Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King -
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:42:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > >
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:42:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > wrote:
> > > I had a patches, which is why I raised the problem with the core:
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > I had a patches, which is why I raised the problem with the core:
> >
> > 6961edfee26d bridge hacks using device links
> >
> > but it never went further
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:42:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:42:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> > China) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +, Brian
On Friday, 18 October 2019 07:38:59 BST james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> > China) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:57:05AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
China) wrote:
>
> Hi Brian:
>
> Can this convince you to fully swap to bridge ?
Not until those patches materialise and land, no :-)
>
> Actually even there is no fix, we won't real encounter such rmmod problem,
>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> > China) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +, Brian
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> China) wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:07:59AM +, james qian wang (Arm
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:48:12AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> China) wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:07:59AM +, james qian wang (Arm
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:21:03AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
China) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:07:59AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> > China) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:22:07PM +,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:20:56AM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:07:59AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
> China) wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:22:07PM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > >
> > > If James is strongly against merging this, maybe we just swap
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:07:59AM +, james qian wang (Arm Technology
China) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:22:07PM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> >
> > If James is strongly against merging this, maybe we just swap
> > wholesale to bridge? But for me, the pragmatic approach would be this
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:22:07PM +, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:51:39PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 9 October 2019 06:54:15 BST james qian wang (Arm Technology
> > China) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:51:39PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Wednesday, 9 October 2019 06:54:15 BST james qian wang (Arm Technology
> China) wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > > To support transmitters other than the
Hi James,
On Wednesday, 9 October 2019 06:54:15 BST james qian wang (Arm Technology
China) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > To support transmitters other than the tda998x, we need to allow
> > non-component framework bridges to be attached to a dummy
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> To support transmitters other than the tda998x, we need to allow
> non-component framework bridges to be attached to a dummy drm_encoder in
> our driver.
>
> For the existing supported encoder (tda998x), keep the behaviour as-is,
19 matches
Mail list logo