On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 09:24:57PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 2/24/22 16:40, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 01:28:37AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > This patch series attempts to address a problem of missing support for DSI
> > > bridge-to-bridge or
On 2/24/22 16:40, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 01:28:37AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
This patch series attempts to address a problem of missing support for DSI
bridge-to-bridge or panel-to-bridge clock frequency negotiation. The problem
has two variants.
First, a
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 01:28:37AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This patch series attempts to address a problem of missing support for DSI
> bridge-to-bridge or panel-to-bridge clock frequency negotiation. The problem
> has two variants.
>
> First, a DSI->to->x bridge derives its own internal
This patch series attempts to address a problem of missing support for DSI
bridge-to-bridge or panel-to-bridge clock frequency negotiation. The problem
has two variants.
First, a DSI->to->x bridge derives its own internal clock from DSI HS clock,
but the DSI HS clock cannot be set to arbitrary
