[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-03-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 19 January 2016 at 17:12, John Harrison wrote: > On 19/01/2016 15:23, Gustavo Padovan wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> 2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : >> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: From: Gustavo Padovan This patch series de-stage the sync

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 20-01-16 om 15:32 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > > 2016-01-20 Maarten Lankhorst : > > > >> Hey, > >> > >> Op 15-01-16 om 15:55 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > >>> From: Gustavo Padovan > >>> > >>> This patch series de-stage the sync

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-20 Thread Gustavo Padovan
2016-01-20 Maarten Lankhorst : > Op 20-01-16 om 15:32 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > > 2016-01-20 Maarten Lankhorst : > > > >> Hey, > >> > >> Op 15-01-16 om 15:55 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > >>> From: Gustavo Padovan > >>> > >>> This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 20-01-16 om 15:32 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > 2016-01-20 Maarten Lankhorst : > >> Hey, >> >> Op 15-01-16 om 15:55 schreef Gustavo Padovan: >>> From: Gustavo Padovan >>> >>> This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish >>> that >>> a bunch of cleanups/improvements

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-20 Thread Gustavo Padovan
2016-01-20 Maarten Lankhorst : > Hey, > > Op 15-01-16 om 15:55 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish > > that > > a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made. > > > > The sync

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, Op 15-01-16 om 15:55 schreef Gustavo Padovan: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish that > a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made. > > The sync framework contained some abstractions around struct fence

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 06:10:40PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > > - get_timeline_name and get_driver_name are imo too much indirection, just > > add ->(drv_)name field to each of these. > > I don't think is a good idea to change that now as there are other fence

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:52:26PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2016-01-19 John Harrison : > > > On 19/01/2016 15:23, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > >Hi Daniel, > > > > > >2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > > > > > >>On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > >>>From: Gustavo

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Gustavo Padovan
2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish > > that > > a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made. > > > > The

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Gustavo Padovan
2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:52:26PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > 2016-01-19 John Harrison : > > > > > On 19/01/2016 15:23, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > >Hi Daniel, > > > > > > > >2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > > > > > > > >>On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200,

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread John Harrison
On 19/01/2016 15:23, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > 2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: >>> From: Gustavo Padovan >>> >>> This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish >>> that >>> a bunch of

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Gustavo Padovan
2016-01-19 John Harrison : > On 19/01/2016 15:23, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > >Hi Daniel, > > > >2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > > > >>On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > >>>From: Gustavo Padovan > >>> > >>>This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Daniel, 2016-01-19 Daniel Vetter : > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish > > that > > a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made.

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:55:10PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish that > a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made. > > The sync framework contained some abstractions

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-15 Thread Gustavo Padovan
From: Gustavo Padovan This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish that a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made. The sync framework contained some abstractions around struct fence and those were removed in

[RFC 00/29] De-stage android's sync framework

2016-01-15 Thread Joe Perches
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 12:55 -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > From: Gustavo Padovan > > This patch series de-stage the sync framework, and in order to accomplish that > a bunch of cleanups/improvements on the sync and fence were made. Perhaps add/update a MAINTAINERS entry too?