On 15/05/2024 08:14, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.05.24 um 20:09 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
The logic assumed any migration attempt worked and therefore would over-
account the amount of data migrated during buffer re-validation. As a
consequence client can be unfairly
Am 08.05.24 um 20:09 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
The logic assumed any migration attempt worked and therefore would over-
account the amount of data migrated during buffer re-validation. As a
consequence client can be unfairly penalised by incorrectly considering
its migration
On 09.05.24 11:19, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 08/05/2024 20:08, Friedrich Vock wrote:
On 08.05.24 20:09, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
The logic assumed any migration attempt worked and therefore would
over-
account the amount of data migrated during buffer re-validation. As a
On 08/05/2024 20:08, Friedrich Vock wrote:
On 08.05.24 20:09, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
The logic assumed any migration attempt worked and therefore would over-
account the amount of data migrated during buffer re-validation. As a
consequence client can be unfairly
On 08.05.24 20:09, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
The logic assumed any migration attempt worked and therefore would over-
account the amount of data migrated during buffer re-validation. As a
consequence client can be unfairly penalised by incorrectly considering
its migration
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
The logic assumed any migration attempt worked and therefore would over-
account the amount of data migrated during buffer re-validation. As a
consequence client can be unfairly penalised by incorrectly considering
its migration budget spent.
Fix it by looking at the before
