Maxime Ripard writes:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:08:11PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Maxime,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrot
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:08:11PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
Hello Geert,
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Javier
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > > > The commit 45b5866
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > > The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
> > >
Thomas Zimmermann writes:
Hello Thomas,
> Hi
>
> Am 01.09.23 um 09:48 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> Thomas Zimmermann writes:
>>
>>> Hi Javier,
>>>
>>> another idea about this patch: why not just keep the allocation in the
>>> plane's atomic check, but store the temporary buffers in a p
Hi
Am 01.09.23 um 09:48 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
Thomas Zimmermann writes:
Hi Javier,
another idea about this patch: why not just keep the allocation in the
plane's atomic check, but store the temporary buffers in a plane struct.
You'd only grow the arrays length in atomic_check and
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> > The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
>> > .atomic_check() callback") moved the alloc
Maxime Ripard writes:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:48:09AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Thomas Zimmermann writes:
>>
>> > Hi Javier,
>> >
>> > another idea about this patch: why not just keep the allocation in the
>> > plane's atomic check, but store the temporary buffers in a pla
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:22 AM Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
> > .atomic_check() callback") moved the allocation of the intermediate and
> > HW
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:48:09AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Thomas Zimmermann writes:
>
> > Hi Javier,
> >
> > another idea about this patch: why not just keep the allocation in the
> > plane's atomic check, but store the temporary buffers in a plane struct.
> > You'd only grow
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
> .atomic_check() callback") moved the allocation of the intermediate and
> HW buffers from the encoder's .atomic_enable callback to primary plane's
Thomas Zimmermann writes:
> Hi Javier,
>
> another idea about this patch: why not just keep the allocation in the
> plane's atomic check, but store the temporary buffers in a plane struct.
> You'd only grow the arrays length in atomic_check and later fetch the
> pointers in atomic_update. It n
Hi Javier,
another idea about this patch: why not just keep the allocation in the
plane's atomic check, but store the temporary buffers in a plane struct.
You'd only grow the arrays length in atomic_check and later fetch the
pointers in atomic_update. It needs some locking, but nothing complic
Hi Geert
Am 30.08.23 um 09:40 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:08 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 30.08.23 um 08:25 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
.atomic_check() callback") moved the allo
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:08 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 30.08.23 um 08:25 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> > The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
> > .atomic_check() callback") moved the allocation of the intermediate and
> > HW buffers from th
Hi Javier
Am 30.08.23 um 08:25 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
.atomic_check() callback") moved the allocation of the intermediate and
HW buffers from the encoder's .atomic_enable callback to primary plane's
.atomic_check ca
The commit 45b58669e532 ("drm/ssd130x: Allocate buffer in the plane's
.atomic_check() callback") moved the allocation of the intermediate and
HW buffers from the encoder's .atomic_enable callback to primary plane's
.atomic_check callback.
This was suggested by Maxime Ripard because drivers aren't
18 matches
Mail list logo
