On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:51:19AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2021 05:10, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 04:27:18PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > >* Kludgy way of interfacing with
On 03/06/2021 04:41, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:27 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
* Context pinning code
On 03/06/2021 05:47, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:48 AM Matthew Brost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:27 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM
On 03/06/2021 05:10, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 04:27:18PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
[snip]
* Kludgy way of interfacing with rest of the driver instead of refactoring
to fit (idling, breadcrumbs, scheduler, tasklets, ...).
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:48 AM Matthew Brost wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:27 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
> > wrote:
> > > On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 04:27:18PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > > Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:27 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
> wrote:
> > On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >> * Context pinning code with it's magical two adds,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:27 PM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
> On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >> * Context pinning code with it's magical two adds, subtract and cmpxchg
> >> is
> >> dodgy as well.
> >
> > Daniele tried to
On 25/05/2021 17:45, Matthew Brost wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:32:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
> > upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
> >
> > At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:31 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Pulling a few threads together...
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:39 PM Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Martin on this. Given that using GuC currently involves
> > making your open-source graphics stack rely on a closed-source
On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits between
the i915 and the GPU. It offloads some of the scheduling of
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:36:37AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 6:12 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
> > > upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:11:56PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
> > upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
> >
> > At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 6:12 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
> > upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
> >
> > At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits
Pulling a few threads together...
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:39 PM Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> I agree with Martin on this. Given that using GuC currently involves
> making your open-source graphics stack rely on a closed-source
> cryptographically-protected blob in order to submit commands to
On 06/05/2021 20:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits between
the i915 and the GPU. It offloads some of the scheduling of
; Ekstrand, Jason ;
Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele ; Bloomfield, Jon
; Vetter, Daniel ;
Harrison, John C
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915
On 10/05/2021 19:33, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Martin Peres
wrote:
On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand
el ; Ursulin, Tvrtko
> > ; Ekstrand, Jason ;
> > Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele ; Bloomfield, Jon
> > ; Vetter, Daniel ;
> > Harrison, John C
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915
> >
> > On 10/05/2021 19:33, Daniel Vetter wrote
ter, Daniel ;
> Harrison, John C
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915
>
> On 10/05/2021 19:33, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Martin Peres
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/05/2021 02:11, Ja
On 10/05/2021 19:33, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Martin Peres wrote:
On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point
On 10/05/2021 19:25, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On May 10, 2021 08:55:55 Martin Peres wrote:
On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in
On 11/05/2021 05:58, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2021 16:11:43 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Yes, landing GuC support may be the first step in removing execlist
support. The inevitable reality is that GPU scheduling is coming and
likely to be there only path in the not-too-distant
On Sun, 09 May 2021 16:11:43 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> Yes, landing GuC support may be the first step in removing execlist
> support. The inevitable reality is that GPU scheduling is coming and
> likely to be there only path in the not-too-distant future. (See also
> the ongoing thread
Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Martin Peres wrote:
>>
>> On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> > On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> >>> Basic GuC submission support. This is the
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Martin Peres wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
> >>> Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
> >>>
On May 10, 2021 08:55:55 Martin Peres wrote:
On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following
On 10/05/2021 02:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level the GuC is a
On May 9, 2021 12:12:36 Martin Peres wrote:
Hi,
On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits between
the i915
Hi,
On 06/05/2021 22:13, Matthew Brost wrote:
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits between
the i915 and the GPU. It offloads some of the scheduling
Basic GuC submission support. This is the first bullet point in the
upstreaming plan covered in the following RFC [1].
At a very high level the GuC is a piece of firmware which sits between
the i915 and the GPU. It offloads some of the scheduling of contexts
from the i915 and programs the GPU to
31 matches
Mail list logo
