On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:03:37PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:46:07PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:59:44PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> > > > > On Tue,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Liam,
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:46:07PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Liam,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:59:44PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey
Hi Liam,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:46:07PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> > Hi Liam,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:59:44PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Liam,
> > > >
> > > > I'm missing
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Liam,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:59:44PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Liam,
> > >
> > > I'm missing a bit of context here, but I did read the v1 thread.
> > > Please accept my apologies if
Hi Liam,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:59:44PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> > Hi Liam,
> >
> > I'm missing a bit of context here, but I did read the v1 thread.
> > Please accept my apologies if I'm re-treading trodden ground.
> >
> > I do know we're
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Liam,
>
> I'm missing a bit of context here, but I did read the v1 thread.
> Please accept my apologies if I'm re-treading trodden ground.
>
> I do know we're chasing nebulous ion "problems" on our end, which
> certainly seem to be related to what
Hi Liam,
I'm missing a bit of context here, but I did read the v1 thread.
Please accept my apologies if I'm re-treading trodden ground.
I do know we're chasing nebulous ion "problems" on our end, which
certainly seem to be related to what you're trying to fix here.
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Liam Mark wrote:
> > Based on the suggestions from Laura I created a first draft for a change
> > which will attempt to ensure that uncached mappings are only applied to
> > ION memory who's cache lines have been cleaned.
>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Liam Mark wrote:
> Based on the suggestions from Laura I created a first draft for a change
> which will attempt to ensure that uncached mappings are only applied to
> ION memory who's cache lines have been cleaned.
> It does this by providing cached mappings (for
Based on the suggestions from Laura I created a first draft for a change
which will attempt to ensure that uncached mappings are only applied to
ION memory who's cache lines have been cleaned.
It does this by providing cached mappings (for uncached ION allocations)
until the ION buffer is dma
10 matches
Mail list logo
