On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:04 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:37 PM Kenny Ho wrote:
> > (sending again, I keep missing the reply-all in gmail.)
> You can make it the default somewhere in the gmail options.
Um... interesting, my option was actually not set (neither reply or
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:37 PM Kenny Ho wrote:
> (sending again, I keep missing the reply-all in gmail.)
You can make it the default somewhere in the gmail options.
(also resending, I missed that you didn't group-replied).
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:25 PM Kenny Ho wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 26,
(sending again, I keep missing the reply-all in gmail.)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Why the separate, explicit registration step? I think a simpler design for
> drivers would be that we set up cgroups if there's anything to be
> controlled, and then for GEM drivers
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:05:13AM -0400, Kenny Ho wrote:
> Change-Id: I908ee6975ea0585e4c30eafde4599f87094d8c65
> Signed-off-by: Kenny Ho
Why the separate, explicit registration step? I think a simpler design for
drivers would be that we set up cgroups if there's anything to be
controlled, and
Change-Id: I908ee6975ea0585e4c30eafde4599f87094d8c65
Signed-off-by: Kenny Ho
---
include/drm/drm_cgroup.h | 24
include/linux/cgroup_drm.h | 10
kernel/cgroup/drm.c| 116 +
3 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
