On 6/16/20 9:49 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 16.06.20 um 05:10 schrieb Rong Chen:
On 6/16/20 4:58 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot
wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due
Hi Emil,
Thanks for the guidance, we'll add these information in future reports.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
On 6/16/20 9:49 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Rong,
Thanks for the prompt reply and information. Can I suggest including
the suggested information in future reports.
I've included a command
Hi
Am 15.06.20 um 22:58 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
>> phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due to commit:
>>
> On one hand, I'm really happy to see performance
Hi Rong,
Thanks for the prompt reply and information. Can I suggest including
the suggested information in future reports.
I've included a command for each one, to aid automating things.
Namely:
Xorg: 1.20.4 (or None)
$ which Xorg 2>/dev/null || echo None && Xorg -version |& grep -o "X
Hi
Am 16.06.20 um 05:10 schrieb Rong Chen:
>
>
> On 6/16/20 4:58 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot
>> wrote:
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
>>> phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due to commit:
>>>
>> On
On 6/16/20 11:10 AM, Rong Chen wrote:
On 6/16/20 4:58 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot
wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due to commit:
On one hand, I'm really happy to see
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 08:11, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -64.9% regression of
> phoronix-test-suite.glmark2.800x600.score due to commit:
>
On one hand, I'm really happy to see performance testing happening
although this report is missing various crucial
