> Well how about completely removing the concept of a global TT from TTM?
Yes makes sense to me to try and rip out the global TT from the core
and turn it into a driver optional feature is possible.
Dave.
>
> What TTM should do is managing domains and help with the transitions
> between those
Am 10.08.20 um 22:05 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 05:24, Christian König wrote:
Am 10.08.20 um 20:51 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 22:20, Christian König wrote:
Am 07.08.20 um 09:02 schrieb Christian König:
Am 06.08.20 um 20:50 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 05:24, Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 10.08.20 um 20:51 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 22:20, Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Am 07.08.20 um 09:02 schrieb Christian König:
> >>> Am 06.08.20 um 20:50 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
> Am 06.08.20 um 17:28
Am 10.08.20 um 20:51 schrieb Dave Airlie:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 22:20, Christian König wrote:
Am 07.08.20 um 09:02 schrieb Christian König:
Am 06.08.20 um 20:50 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am 06.08.20 um 17:28 schrieb Christian König:
My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 22:20, Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 07.08.20 um 09:02 schrieb Christian König:
> > Am 06.08.20 um 20:50 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
> >> Am 06.08.20 um 17:28 schrieb Christian König:
> >>> My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
> >>>
> >>> Crash #1 is
Am 07.08.20 um 09:02 schrieb Christian König:
Am 06.08.20 um 20:50 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am 06.08.20 um 17:28 schrieb Christian König:
My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be cause by the
atomic-helper change
Hello.
Commit 2ddef17678bc2ea1 ("drm/ttm: make TT creation purely optional v3") broke
vmwgfx .
At first I suspected it is "drm/atomic-helper: reset vblank on crtc reset" or
around that,
but bisection said it is not. I have no idea what is going on. Please have a
look.
--- Crash pattern 1 ---
On 2020/08/07 0:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:28 PM Christian König
> wrote:
>>
>> My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
>>
>> Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be cause by the
>> atomic-helper change you noted below.
>
> Yeah, and
Am 06.08.20 um 20:50 schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am 06.08.20 um 17:28 schrieb Christian König:
My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be cause by the
atomic-helper change you noted below.
Crash #2 is caused because
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:56 AM Tetsuo Handa
wrote:
>
> On 2020/08/07 0:39, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:28 PM Christian König
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
> >>
> >> Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be
Am 06.08.20 um 17:28 schrieb Christian König:
> My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
>
> Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be cause by the
> atomic-helper change you noted below.
>
> Crash #2 is caused because vmw_bo_create_and_populate() tries to
>
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:28 PM Christian König wrote:
>
> My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
>
> Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be cause by the
> atomic-helper change you noted below.
Yeah, and I think I know what's going on. Patch incoming. When
My best guess is that you are facing two separate bugs here.
Crash #1 is somehow related to CRTCs and might even be cause by the
atomic-helper change you noted below.
Crash #2 is caused because vmw_bo_create_and_populate() tries to
manually populate a BO object instead of relying on TTM to
13 matches
Mail list logo
