Hi, Daniel
Thanks for your clarification, and I will fix this error.
--
Meng
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Stone [mailto:dan...@fooishbar.org]
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 11:10 PM
To: Meng Yi
Cc: Stefan Agner ; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Yi
Meng-B56799
Subject:
On 2016-01-01 07:10, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30 December 2015 at 07:37, Meng Yi wrote:
>> I have tested your patch, It seems good to me.
>> But I think state->fb check is still necessary, because fb is related to
>> crtc , and panel is related to connector,. When fsl,panel is not
Hi,
On 30 December 2015 at 07:37, Meng Yi wrote:
> I have tested your patch, It seems good to me.
> But I think state->fb check is still necessary, because fb is related to crtc
> , and panel is related to connector,. When fsl,panel is not valid, it
> indicate that connector is not available,
Hi, Stefan
I have tested your patch, It seems good to me.
But I think state->fb check is still necessary, because fb is related to crtc ,
and panel is related to connector,. When fsl,panel is not valid, it indicate
that connector is not available, but fb check is still needed. But I am not so
Hi Meng,
The only situation I could observe that is when fsl,panel was not
valid...
However, I think with my patch "drm/fsl-dcu: Fix no fb check bug", this
situation can be avoided completely:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/18/950
With that patch applied, and a non-existing panel assigned, the
Tested-by: Meng Yi
-é®ä»¶å件-
å件人: Dongsheng Wang [mailto:Dongsheng.Wang at freescale.com]
åéæ¶é´: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:16 PM
æ¶ä»¶äºº: airlied at linux.ie
æé: stefan at agner.ch; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Jianwei Wang
; Yi Meng-B56799 ; Wang
