On 11/16/2012 01:14 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:05:40PM -0800, Aaron Plattner wrote:
At the suggestion of a few drm developers, I'm looking at abstracting the buffer
sharing mechanism away from the individual drm drivers and treating it as a
low-level interface that kerne
On 11/16/2012 01:14 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:05:40PM -0800, Aaron Plattner wrote:
>> At the suggestion of a few drm developers, I'm looking at abstracting the
>> buffer
>> sharing mechanism away from the individual drm drivers and treating it as a
>> low-level interfac
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:05:40PM -0800, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> At the suggestion of a few drm developers, I'm looking at abstracting the
> buffer
> sharing mechanism away from the individual drm drivers and treating it as a
> low-level interface that kernel subsystems use to communicate, rather
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:05:40PM -0800, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> At the suggestion of a few drm developers, I'm looking at abstracting the
> buffer
> sharing mechanism away from the individual drm drivers and treating it as a
> low-level interface that kernel subsystems use to communicate, rather
At the suggestion of a few drm developers, I'm looking at abstracting the buffer
sharing mechanism away from the individual drm drivers and treating it as a
low-level interface that kernel subsystems use to communicate, rather than as
something drivers should be accessing directly. This would also
At the suggestion of a few drm developers, I'm looking at abstracting the buffer
sharing mechanism away from the individual drm drivers and treating it as a
low-level interface that kernel subsystems use to communicate, rather than as
something drivers should be accessing directly. This would also
