On 7 May 2014 15:26, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> So now I've been playing with MST I think get the feeling I might need
>> some explicit locking on the AUX channel, I think at the moment the
>> mode_config mutex implicitly defends the aux channel as t
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> So now I've been playing with MST I think get the feeling I might need
> some explicit locking on the AUX channel, I think at the moment the
> mode_config mutex implicitly defends the aux channel as the only real
> paths into it are
>
> a) from
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:20:41AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> So now I've been playing with MST I think get the feeling I might need
> some explicit locking on the AUX channel, I think at the moment the
> mode_config mutex implicitly defends the aux channel as the only real
> paths into it are
>
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:12:54PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 7 May 2014 15:26, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> So now I've been playing with MST I think get the feeling I might need
> >> some explicit locking on the AUX channel, I think at the mo
So now I've been playing with MST I think get the feeling I might need
some explicit locking on the AUX channel, I think at the moment the
mode_config mutex implicitly defends the aux channel as the only real
paths into it are
a) from userspace connector probing,
b) from HPD irqs,
currently both