Re: DRM-related kmalloc-32 memory leak in 2.6.35

2010-09-27 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Still present in 2.6.35. Appears to be DRM: > > > > 845 drm_vm_open_locked+0x72/0x109 age=43/37572/59269 pid=2089 > > cpus=0-1 > > > > That's after about a minute of uptime. Grows to 100k in about a day. > > > > dmesg bits: > > [0.834653] [d

DRM-related kmalloc-32 memory leak in 2.6.35

2010-09-27 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Still present in 2.6.35. Appears to be DRM: > > > > 845 drm_vm_open_locked+0x72/0x109 age=43/37572/59269 pid=2089 > > cpus=0-1 > > > > That's after about a minute of uptime. Grows to 100k in about a day. > > > > dmesg bits: > > [0.834653] [d

Re: DRM-related kmalloc-32 memory leak in 2.6.35

2010-09-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:59:09 -0500 Matt Mackall wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:37 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > > kmalloc-321113344 1113344 32 1281 : tunables00 > > > 0 : slabdata 8698 8698 0 > > > > > >

DRM-related kmalloc-32 memory leak in 2.6.35

2010-09-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:59:09 -0500 Matt Mackall wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:37 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > > kmalloc-321113344 1113344 32 1281 : tunables00 > > > 0 : slabdata 8698 8698 0 > > > > > >