On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> On Thursday, 31 August 2017 19:12:58 EEST Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 31 août 2017 à 17:28 +0300, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
>>> >> e.g. if I have two devices
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Thursday, 31 August 2017 19:12:58 EEST Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>> Le jeudi 31 août 2017 à 17:28 +0300, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
>> >> e.g. if I have two devices which support MODIFIER_FOO, I could attempt
>> >> to share
Hi Nicolas,
On Thursday, 31 August 2017 19:12:58 EEST Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le jeudi 31 août 2017 à 17:28 +0300, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> >> e.g. if I have two devices which support MODIFIER_FOO, I could attempt
> >> to share a buffer between them which uses MODIFIER_FOO without
> >> neces
Le jeudi 31 août 2017 à 17:28 +0300, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> > e.g. if I have two devices which support MODIFIER_FOO, I could attempt
> > to share a buffer between them which uses MODIFIER_FOO without
> > necessarily knowing exactly what it is/does.
>
> Userspace could certainly set modifiers
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:51:33PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 13:32:01 EEST Brian Starkey wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 30/08/17 11:36, Brian Starkey wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:10:01AM
Hi Brian,
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 13:32:01 EEST Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 30/08/17 11:36, Brian Starkey wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On 30/08/17 09:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
gt;>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
> >>>>>>> it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
> >>>>>>> thread
; >>>
> >>> I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
> >>> it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
> >>> thread.
> >>>
> >>> We'd like to support DRM format mo
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 30/08/17 11:36, Brian Starkey wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 30/08/17 09:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Brian Starkey wrote:
The fact is, adding specia
On 30/08/17 11:36, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 30/08/17 09:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Brian Starkey wrote:
The fact is, adding special formats for each combination is
unmanageable -
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 30/08/17 09:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Brian Starkey wrote:
The fact is, adding special formats for each combination is
unmanageable - we're talking dozens in the case of our hardware.
Hm
On 30/08/17 09:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Brian Starkey wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:49:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Nicolas Dufresne
>>> wrote:
Le jeudi 24 ao??t 2017 ?? 13:26 +0100, Brian Starkey a ?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:49:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Nicolas Dufresne
> > wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 24 ao??t 2017 ?? 13:26 +0100, Brian Starkey a ??crit :
> > > > > What I mean was: an appl
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:49:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
Le jeudi 24 ao??t 2017 ?? 13:26 +0100, Brian Starkey a ??crit :
> What I mean was: an application can use the modifier to give buffers from
> one device to another without ne
:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Brian Starkey wrote:
Hi all,
I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
thread.
We'd like to support DRM format modifi
Le jeudi 24 août 2017 à 13:26 +0100, Brian Starkey a écrit :
> > What I mean was: an application can use the modifier to give buffers from
> > one device to another without needing to understand it.
> >
> > But a generic video capture application that processes the video itself
> > cannot be expec
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 août 2017 à 13:26 +0100, Brian Starkey a écrit :
>> > What I mean was: an application can use the modifier to give buffers from
>> > one device to another without needing to understand it.
>> >
>> > But a generic video capture
06:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Brian Starkey
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
>>>>
couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
thread.
We'd like to support DRM format modifiers in v4l2 in order to share
the description of different (mostly proprietary) buffer formats
between e.
>>>
>>>> I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
>>>> it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
>>>> thread.
>>>>
>>>> We'd like to support DRM format modifiers
d to be steered in the direction of a
thread.
We'd like to support DRM format modifiers in v4l2 in order to share
the description of different (mostly proprietary) buffer formats
between e.g. a v4l2 device and a DRM device.
DRM format modifiers are defined in include/uapi/drm/drm_fourc
of a
>> thread.
>>
>> We'd like to support DRM format modifiers in v4l2 in order to share
>> the description of different (mostly proprietary) buffer formats
>> between e.g. a v4l2 device and a DRM device.
>>
>> DRM format modifiers are defined in i
27;d like to support DRM format modifiers in v4l2 in order to share
the description of different (mostly proprietary) buffer formats
between e.g. a v4l2 device and a DRM device.
DRM format modifiers are defined in include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h and
are a vendor-namespaced 64-bit value used to des
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
> it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
> thread.
>
> We'd like to support DRM format
Hi all,
I couldn't find this topic talked about elsewhere, but apologies if
it's a duplicate - I'll be glad to be steered in the direction of a
thread.
We'd like to support DRM format modifiers in v4l2 in order to share
the description of different (mostly proprietary) bu
25 matches
Mail list logo
