On 2023-04-26 04:52:43, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Joonas asked me to put my thoughts here:
>
> - in general the "feature discovery by trying it out" approach is most
> robust and hence preferred, but it's also not something that's required
> when there's good reasons against it
More robust
On 4/26/2023 9:48 AM, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 13:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:41:54PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
(+ Faith and Daniel as they have been involved in previous discussions)
Quoting Jordan Justen (2023-04-24 20:13:00)
On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 13:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:41:54PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > (+ Faith and Daniel as they have been involved in previous discussions)
> > Quoting Jordan Justen (2023-04-24 20:13:00)
> > > On 2023-04-24 02:08:43, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:41:54PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> (+ Faith and Daniel as they have been involved in previous discussions)
>
> Quoting Jordan Justen (2023-04-24 20:13:00)
> > On 2023-04-24 02:08:43, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > Being able to "list" supported extensions
On 2023-04-25 06:41:54, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> (+ Faith and Daniel as they have been involved in previous discussions)
>
> Quoting Jordan Justen (2023-04-24 20:13:00)
> > On 2023-04-24 02:08:43, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > Being able to "list" supported extensions sounds like a
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 16:41 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> (+ Faith and Daniel as they have been involved in previous discussions)
An orthogonal (but losely related) question: Is PXP the only subsystem that has
the unique problem of: Uses a delayed worker to complete all dependencies for
init..
(+ Faith and Daniel as they have been involved in previous discussions)
Quoting Jordan Justen (2023-04-24 20:13:00)
> On 2023-04-24 02:08:43, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > Being able to "list" supported extensions sounds like a reasonable
> > principle, albeit a departure from the design
