On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 14:03, Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 13.05.22 um 11:21 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> > On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 14:09, Christian König
> > wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> re-sending this because Daniel was requesting a background why this is
> >> useful.
> >>
> >> When TTM
Am 13.05.22 um 11:21 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 14:09, Christian König
wrote:
Hi everyone,
re-sending this because Daniel was requesting a background why this is
useful.
When TTM creates a buffer this object initially should not have any
backing store and there no resource
On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 14:09, Christian König
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> re-sending this because Daniel was requesting a background why this is
> useful.
>
> When TTM creates a buffer this object initially should not have any
> backing store and there no resource object associated with it. The
Patch set reviewed. Good stuff.
Acked-by: Luben Tuikov
Regards,
Luben
On 2022-05-09 09:09, Christian König wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> re-sending this because Daniel was requesting a background why this is
> useful.
>
> When TTM creates a buffer this object initially should not have any
>
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:09:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> re-sending this because Daniel was requesting a background why this is
> useful.
Thanks a lot for typing this up. To make sure this isn't lost, could you
add a patch to at least add this as a comment to
Hi everyone,
re-sending this because Daniel was requesting a background why this is
useful.
When TTM creates a buffer this object initially should not have any
backing store and there no resource object associated with it. The same
can happen when a driver requests that the backing store of an
