Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:16:17 -0800 Daniel Latypov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:38 AM Michał Winiarski > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > > >

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-07 Thread David Gow
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 11:23 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > > The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own > way to do unit tests, which seems to be added before KUnit. > > I'm now

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-07 Thread Daniel Latypov
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:20 PM Daniel Latypov wrote: > rm...@google.com was working on them and should hopefully be able to > send them out real soon. > You should get CC'd on those. > > I think the follow-up work is just crafting an example parser input > file and iterating until > $

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-07 Thread Daniel Latypov
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:38 AM Michał Winiarski wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > > > > The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own > >

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-07 Thread Michał Winiarski
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > > The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own > way to do unit tests, which seems to be added before KUnit. > > I'm

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-04 Thread Daniel Latypov
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:50 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 15:43:26 -0700 > Daniel Latypov wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:23 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > >

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-04 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:49:55 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 15:43:26 -0700 > Daniel Latypov wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:23 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver.

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-04 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 15:43:26 -0700 Daniel Latypov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:23 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > > > > The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own > > way

Re: KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-03 Thread Daniel Latypov
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:23 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. > > The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own > way to do unit tests, which seems to be added before KUnit. > > I'm now checking

KUnit issues - Was: [igt-dev] [PATCH RFC v2 8/8] drm/i915: check if current->mm is not NULL

2022-11-03 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi, I'm facing a couple of issues when testing KUnit with the i915 driver. The DRM subsystem and the i915 driver has, for a long time, his own way to do unit tests, which seems to be added before KUnit. I'm now checking if it is worth start using KUnit at i915. So, I wrote a RFC with some