On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:27:23AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 3:34 PM David Laight wrote:
> > From: Maxime Ripard
> > > Sent: 04 March 2024 11:46
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:27 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 3:34 PM David Laight wrote:
> > From: Maxime Ripard
> > > Sent: 04 March 2024 11:46
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh Kamboju
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 3:34 PM David Laight wrote:
> From: Maxime Ripard
> > Sent: 04 March 2024 11:46
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > The arm defconfig builds failed on today's Linux next
From: Maxime Ripard
> Sent: 04 March 2024 11:46
>
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > The arm defconfig builds failed on today's Linux next tag next-20240304.
> > >
> > > Build log:
> > > -
> > >
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 14:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 14:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 13:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:45, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> It's not critical if this is called infrequently, and as Maxime
> >>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 14:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 13:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:45, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> It's not critical if this is called infrequently, and as Maxime
>> just replied, the 64-bit division is in fact required here.
>>
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 13:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:45, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:26:46 +0100
> > "Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:11:36 +0100 "Arnd Bergmann"
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:45, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:26:46 +0100
> "Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> > On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:11:36 +0100 "Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This used to be a 32-bit division. If the rate
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The arm defconfig builds failed on today's Linux next tag next-20240304.
> >
> > Build log:
> > -
> > ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod"
> >
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:26:46 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:11:36 +0100 "Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
> >>
> >> This used to be a 32-bit division. If the rate is never more than
> >> 4.2GHz, clock could be turned back
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 12:24, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:11:36 +0100 "Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
>>
>> This used to be a 32-bit division. If the rate is never more than
>> 4.2GHz, clock could be turned back into 'unsigned long' to avoid
>> the expensive div_u64().
>
> Wouldn't
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:11:36 +0100
"Arnd Bergmann" wrote:
Hi,
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The arm defconfig builds failed on today's Linux next tag next-20240304.
> >
> > Build log:
> > -
> > ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod"
> >
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024, at 09:07, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> The arm defconfig builds failed on today's Linux next tag next-20240304.
>
> Build log:
> -
> ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod"
> [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-drm-hdmi.ko] undefined!
>
Apparently caused by the 64-bit division in
13 matches
Mail list logo
