Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions

2018-12-11 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:15:11PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT > > > bit to > > > be set,

Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions

2018-12-10 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT > > bit to > > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo. > > It's not a

Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Set the MOT bit for Write_Status_Update_Request transactions

2018-12-10 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT bit to > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo. It's not a type. We're just preserving MOT. What makes you think it should always be