Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: move cpu_writers handling into vmwgfx v2

2019-10-01 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Christian, On 9/30/19 6:34 PM, Christian König wrote: > From: Christian König > > This feature is only used by vmwgfx and superflous for everybody else. > > v2: use vmw_buffer_object instead of vmw_user_bo. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König > --- I just sent out a patch based on this that

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: move cpu_writers handling into vmwgfx

2019-06-14 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Christian, On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 14:58 +0200, Christian König wrote: > Thomas just a gentle ping on this. > > It's not that my live depends on this, but it would still be a nice > to > have cleanup. > > Thanks, > Christian. > I thought I had answered this, but I can't find it in my

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: move cpu_writers handling into vmwgfx

2019-06-14 Thread Christian König
Thomas just a gentle ping on this. It's not that my live depends on this, but it would still be a nice to have cleanup. Thanks, Christian. Am 07.06.19 um 16:47 schrieb Christian König: This feature is only used by vmwgfx and superflous for everybody else. Signed-off-by: Christian König

Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: move cpu_writers handling into vmwgfx

2019-06-12 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Christian, This looks OK, although there are a couple of minor alterations needed in the vmwgfx driver: - We should operate on vmw_buffer_objects rather than on user_buffer_objects. - vmw_user_bo_verify_synccpu should move to the validate code. I can take care of that if it's ok with you.