On 2018-10-22 1:23 p.m., Arun KS wrote:
> Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> variables.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka
> Signed-off-by: Arun KS
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling
Regards,
Felix
>
> ---
> As discussed here,
>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:53:22PM +0530, Arun KS wrote:
> Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> variables.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka
> Signed-off-by: Arun KS
>
> ---
> As discussed here,
>
On Mon 22-10-18 22:53:22, Arun KS wrote:
> Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> variables.
I assume this has been auto-generated. If yes, it would be better to
mention the script so that people can review it and regenerate for
comparision. Such a large change is hard
Arun KS writes:
> Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> variables.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka
> Signed-off-by: Arun KS
>
> ---
> As discussed here,
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10627521/#22261253
My 2 cents. I think you
On 2018-10-23 09:45, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:53 +0530, Arun KS wrote:
Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
variables.
Hello Joe,
Perhaps better to define and use macros for the accesses
instead of specific uses of atomic_long_
Something like:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:41 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Mon 22-10-18 22:53:22, Arun KS wrote:
> > Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> > variables.
>
Hello Michal,
> I assume this has been auto-generated. If yes, it would be better to
> mention the script so that
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:53 +0530, Arun KS wrote:
> Remove managed_page_count_lock spinlock and instead use atomic
> variables.
Perhaps better to define and use macros for the accesses
instead of specific uses of atomic_long_
Something like:
#define totalram_pages()(unsigned
