Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: report consistent errors when checking syncobj capibility

2019-04-16 Thread Koenig, Christian
Am 16.04.19 um 14:43 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote: >> Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin: >>> We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and >>> returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: report consistent errors when checking syncobj capibility

2019-04-16 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
On 16/04/2019 13:40, Christian König wrote: Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin: We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the syncobj capibility. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin Fixes: ea569910cbab98

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: report consistent errors when checking syncobj capibility

2019-04-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin: > > We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and > > returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the syncobj > > capibility. > > > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: report consistent errors when checking syncobj capibility

2019-04-16 Thread Christian König
Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin: We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the syncobj capibility. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin Fixes: ea569910cbab98 ("drm/syncobj: add transition iotcls between