Am 16.04.19 um 14:43 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
>>> We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and
>>> returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the
On 16/04/2019 13:40, Christian König wrote:
Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and
returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the syncobj
capibility.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin
Fixes: ea569910cbab98
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
> > We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and
> > returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the syncobj
> > capibility.
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
Am 16.04.19 um 14:30 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
We've been somewhat inconsistent when adding the new ioctl and
returned ENODEV instead of EOPNOTSUPPORTED upon failing the syncobj
capibility.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin
Fixes: ea569910cbab98 ("drm/syncobj: add transition iotcls between