On 1/18/19 1:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 1/16/19 9:12 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 1/16/19 9:28 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
to
On 1/16/19 9:12 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
On 1/16/19 9:28 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left
On 1/16/19 9:28 AM, Brian Starkey wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
>> to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left NULL
>> except here. We can make it
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> The heap name can be used for debugging but otherwise does not seem
> to be required and no other part of the code will fail if left NULL
> except here. We can make it required and check for it at some point,
> for now
