Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-08-09 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Laurent, thanks for the review! Most of it seemed clear how to fix for the rest i've put some questions below: On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 05:47:00AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello Guido, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-31 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:40 PM Jernej Škrabec wrote: > > Yes, I understood the idea, but this would print: > > > > ensabling or dissabling :-) > > No, it wouldn't. That extra "s" is part of "%s", e.g. part of format > specifier. Ops, you are right. Sorry about that!

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-31 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:43:47AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Guido, > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:35 AM Guido Günther wrote: > > > The idea is to have > > > > "%sabling platform clocks", enable ? "en" : "dis"); > > > > depending whether clocks are enabled/disabled. > > Yes, I

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-31 Thread Jernej Škrabec
Hi! Dne sreda, 31. julij 2019 ob 16:43:47 CEST je Fabio Estevam napisal(a): > Hi Guido, > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:35 AM Guido Günther wrote: > > The idea is to have > > > > "%sabling platform clocks", enable ? "en" : "dis"); > > > > depending whether clocks are enabled/disabled. > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-31 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Guido, On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:35 AM Guido Günther wrote: > The idea is to have > > "%sabling platform clocks", enable ? "en" : "dis"); > > depending whether clocks are enabled/disabled. Yes, I understood the idea, but this would print: ensabling or dissabling :-) > > Same here.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-31 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 05:04:44AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:01:52PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Guido, > > > > Thanks for your work on this driver! > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > --- /dev/null >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-31 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Fabio, thanks for having a look! I followed most of your comments, there's some things i'm unsure, see below: On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:01:52PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Guido, > > Thanks for your work on this driver! > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Guido Günther wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello Guido, Thank you for the patch. On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > This adds initial support for the NWL MIPI DSI Host controller found on > i.MX8 SoCs. > > It adds support for the i.MX8MQ but the same IP can be found on > e.g. the i.MX8QXP. > > It has been

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:01:52PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Guido, > > Thanks for your work on this driver! > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Guido Günther wrote: > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx-nwl/Kconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > > +config

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-26 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Guido, Thanks for your work on this driver! On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Guido Günther wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/imx-nwl/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > +config DRM_IMX_NWL_DSI > + tristate "Support for Northwest Logic MIPI DSI Host controller" > +

Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

2019-07-26 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Guido. Following some trivial comments. As for the overall design I already commented on that in the binding. (bridge versus display controller) That it can work on top of mxsfb is a good indication that it is a bridge but I just do not see the full picture. In general the code looked clean