Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-11 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 16:20:37 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:25:22 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 03:59:46PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:25:22 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 > > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 05,

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:25:22 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:08:28AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > > The current

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-08 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 15:27:33 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > > state object".

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 01:17:06PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object > isn't

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-07 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:51:06AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > > objects

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-07 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:15:29AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200 > Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > > state object".

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-05 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > > objects affected by

Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

2023-12-05 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object > isn't affected by