On 8/28/25 12:31 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I spoke too soon, it's actually pretty painful to keep 32-bit
>> compatibility, even though it would be nice for testing purposes.
>>
>> I'll paste the diff to fix it below, I think that
On 8/28/25 11:45 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
So Nova should definitely depend upon 64-bit configs.
Yeah, I fully agree.
But I think it would have been good to have a consumer for the generic APIs that
has to deal with it, which I think was also Miguel's point.
I will send a patch for Nova to depe
On Thu Aug 28, 2025 at 9:58 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu Aug 28, 2025 at 9:36 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:31 PM Miguel Ojeda
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> and a `DmaAddress`
>>> newtype, not just a typedef, could perhaps be nice anyway?
>>
>> The one from your linked
On Thu Aug 28, 2025 at 9:36 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:31 PM Miguel Ojeda
> wrote:
>>
>> and a `DmaAddress`
>> newtype, not just a typedef, could perhaps be nice anyway?
>
> The one from your linked patch is not a newtype though, so I guess
> there is a reason for tha
On Thu Aug 28, 2025 at 9:31 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I spoke too soon, it's actually pretty painful to keep 32-bit
>> compatibility, even though it would be nice for testing purposes.
>>
>> I'll paste the diff to fix it belo
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:31 PM Miguel Ojeda
wrote:
>
> and a `DmaAddress`
> newtype, not just a typedef, could perhaps be nice anyway?
The one from your linked patch is not a newtype though, so I guess
there is a reason for that.
Cheers,
Miguel
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> Maybe I spoke too soon, it's actually pretty painful to keep 32-bit
> compatibility, even though it would be nice for testing purposes.
>
> I'll paste the diff to fix it below, I think that makes it obvious why I say
> that.
>
> Instead,
On Thu Aug 28, 2025 at 7:54 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 8/28/25 6:02 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
>> Similar to another one I sent, I hope it helps -- it may be useful to make it
>> build in 32-bit as a test for those kinds of platforms.
>
> Agreed.
Maybe I spoke too soon, it's actually prett
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for reporting!
On 8/28/25 6:02 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
Hi Danilo et al.,
In Linus' tree and -next, for an arm32 LLVM defconfig plus Rust build, I see:
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> drivers/gpu/nova-core/fb.rs:49:59
|
49 | hal::fb_hal(chi
