Re: Rule for bridge yaml dt binding maintainers?

2020-04-22 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Joe. > > > > > I would also be great if you or someone else could: > > > - teach get_maintainers about .yaml file listed maintainers > > > > It already does to some extent. IIRC, there's a mode to extract email > > addresses from files. > > --file-emails > > > I was hoping that the MAINTAIN

Re: Rule for bridge yaml dt binding maintainers?

2020-04-22 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 15:02 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Adrian > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:19:24PM +0300, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I got confused while doing the txt -> yaml conversion at [1] and it's > > > s

Re: Rule for bridge yaml dt binding maintainers?

2020-04-22 Thread Rob Herring
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Adrian > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:19:24PM +0300, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I got confused while doing the txt -> yaml conversion at [1] and it's still > > not clear to me who should be added in the "maintainers" field. C

Re: Rule for bridge yaml dt binding maintainers?

2020-04-20 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Adrian On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:19:24PM +0300, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Hello, > > I got confused while doing the txt -> yaml conversion at [1] and it's still > not clear to me who should be added in the "maintainers" field. Clearly not > the maintainers as returned by get_maintainer.pl. :) >

Rule for bridge yaml dt binding maintainers?

2020-04-20 Thread Adrian Ratiu
Hello, I got confused while doing the txt -> yaml conversion at [1] and it's still not clear to me who should be added in the "maintainers" field. Clearly not the maintainers as returned by get_maintainer.pl. :) Rob mentioned that "owners" should be manintainers but I also have trouble pic