On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
>> f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode that information in
>> the device node (3D uses sync
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> to a point where everybody is
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
> host1x {
> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-host1x", "simple-bus";
> reg = <0x5000 0x00024000>;
> interrupts = <0 64 0x04 /* cop syncpt */
> 0 65 0x04 /* mpcore syncpt */
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
> Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> > think it might still be
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:47:56PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
> but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
> a great thing to get started.
>
> Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > host1x {
> > compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-host1x", "simple-bus";
> > reg = <0x5000 0x00024000>;
> > interrupts = <0 64 0x04 /* cop
Hello Thierry,
I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
a great thing to get started.
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:55 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time
On 06/26/2012 01:31 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m
>>> wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> ...
>
On 06/26/2012 01:27 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>>> On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m
wrote:
> We
On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
> time once I get to
On 06/26/2012 07:01 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>> An alternative would be to call of_platform_populate() from the host1x
[alternative to making the host1x node contain compatible="simple-bus".]
>> driver. This has the advantage that it could
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>>> status = "disabled";
>>>
>>> gart = <>;
>>>
>>> /* video-encoding/decoding */ mpe { reg = <0x5404
>>> 0x0004>; interrupts
On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
>>> f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
time once I get to writing the code because I won't have to redo it over
again.
Hello Thierry,
I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
a great thing to get started.
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:55 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:47:56PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hello Thierry,
I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
a great thing to get started.
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:55
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
host1x {
compatible = nvidia,tegra20-host1x, simple-bus;
reg = 0x5000 0x00024000;
interrupts = 0 64 0x04 /* cop syncpt */
0 65 0x04 /* mpcore syncpt */
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
to a
On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode that information in
the device node (3D uses sync point
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
status = disabled;
gart = gart;
/* video-encoding/decoding
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 07:01 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
An alternative would be to call of_platform_populate() from the host1x
[alternative to making the host1x node contain
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:10:42PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
to a point where everybody is
On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode that
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
status = disabled;
gart = gart;
/* video-encoding/decoding */ mpe { reg = 0x5404
0x0004; interrupts = 0 68 0x04; status =
On 06/26/2012 07:01 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
An alternative would be to call of_platform_populate() from the host1x
[alternative to making the host1x node contain compatible=simple-bus.]
driver. This has the advantage that it could integrate
On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
time once I get to writing
On 06/26/2012 01:27 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström
wrote:
We also assign certain
On 06/26/2012 01:31 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström
wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
status = disabled;
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Old Signed by an unknown key
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now,
I think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree
binding to a
On 06/26/2012 07:46 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
...
I'm not sure I understand how information about the carveout would be
obtained from the IOMMU API, though.
I think that can be similar with current
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:48:14PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:51 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:10:42PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
