On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> > On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> >>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device
On 06/26/2012 08:32 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 07:46 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
> Thierry Reding wrote:
>> ...
I'm not sure I understand how information about the carveout would be
obtained from the IOMMU API, though.
>>>
>>> I think th
On 06/26/2012 07:46 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
>>> Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>> I'm not sure I understand how information about the carveout would be
>> obtained from the IOMMU API, though.
>
> I think that can be similar with current gart implementation. Define
> On 06/26/2012 07:46 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
> >>> Thierry Reding wrote:
> ...
> >> I'm not sure I understand how information about the carveout would be
> >> obtained from the IOMMU API, though.
> >
> > I think that can be similar with current gart implemen
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > > Old Signed by an unknown key
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now,
> > > I think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree
> > > binding to a point
On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
>> f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode that information in
>> the device node (3D uses sync poi
On 06/26/2012 01:51 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:10:42PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right
>>> now, I think it might still be useful if we could get
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> to a point where everybody is happy
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
> host1x {
> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-host1x", "simple-bus";
> reg = <0x5000 0x00024000>;
> interrupts = <0 64 0x04 /* cop syncpt */
> 0 65 0x04 /* mpcore syncpt */
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
> Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> > think it might still be
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:47:56PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
> but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
> a great thing to get started.
>
> Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > host1x {
> > compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-host1x", "simple-bus";
> > reg = <0x5000 0x00024000>;
> > interrupts = <0 64 0x04 /* cop syncp
Hello Thierry,
I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
a great thing to get started.
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:55 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time t
On 06/26/2012 01:31 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström
>>> wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> ...
> stat
On 06/26/2012 01:27 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
>>> On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström
wrote:
> We a
On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
> time once I get to writi
On 06/26/2012 07:01 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>> An alternative would be to call of_platform_populate() from the host1x
[alternative to making the host1x node contain compatible="simple-bus".]
>> driver. This has the advantage that it could integr
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
>> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>>> status = "disabled";
>>>
>>> gart = <&gart>;
>>>
>>> /* video-encoding/decoding */ mpe { reg = <0x5404
>>> 0x0004>; interr
On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
>>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
>>> f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode th
On 06/26/2012 01:31 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m
>>> wrote:
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> ...
> stat
On 06/26/2012 01:27 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>>> On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m
wrote:
> We a
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
time once I get to writing the code because I won't have to redo it over
again. =)
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:10:42PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> > think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> > to a point where ever
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46:42AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 07:01 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
> > On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
> ...
> >> An alternative would be to call of_platform_populate() from the host1x
>
> [alternative to making the host1x node contain compa
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
> >> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
> ...
> >>> status = "disabled";
> >>>
> >>> gart = <&gart>;
> >>>
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:41:43AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergström wrote:
> > On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
> >>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device
On 06/26/2012 04:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
> time once I get to writi
On 06/26/2012 07:01 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>> An alternative would be to call of_platform_populate() from the host1x
[alternative to making the host1x node contain compatible="simple-bus".]
>> driver. This has the advantage that it could integr
On 06/26/2012 07:41 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
>>> status = "disabled";
>>>
>>> gart = <&gart>;
>>>
>>> /* video-encoding/decoding */ mpe { reg = <0x5404
>>> 0x0004>; interr
On 06/26/2012 08:02 AM, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergstr?m wrote:
>>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
>>> f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode th
On 26.06.2012 16:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
>> We also assign certain host1x common resources per device by convention,
>> f.ex. sync points, channels etc. We currently encode that information in
>> the device node (3D uses sync poi
Hi Thierry,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
> to a point where everybody is happy
On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
> host1x {
> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-host1x", "simple-bus";
> reg = <0x5000 0x00024000>;
> interrupts = <0 64 0x04 /* cop syncpt */
> 0 65 0x04 /* mpcore syncpt */
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:02:24PM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:13 +0200
> Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
> > think it might still be
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:47:56PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
> but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
> a great thing to get started.
>
> Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:01:05PM +0300, Terje Bergström wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 13:55, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > host1x {
> > compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-host1x", "simple-bus";
> > reg = <0x5000 0x00024000>;
> > interrupts = <0 64 0x04 /* cop syncp
Hello Thierry,
I still haven't found the time to look at device tree things in detail,
but still some comments inline. Overall I think the tree looks ok and is
a great thing to get started.
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2012, 12:55 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> Hi,
>
> while I haven't got much time t
Hi,
while I haven't got much time to work on the actual code right now, I
think it might still be useful if we could get the device tree binding
to a point where everybody is happy with it. That'll also save me some
time once I get to writing the code because I won't have to redo it over
again. =)
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo