On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> I suppose the philosophy here is
>> that on android, surfaceflinger (userspace) is the trusted one (which
>> may well be correct on some vendor kernel branches), whereas upstream
>> the
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> I suppose the philosophy here is
> that on android, surfaceflinger (userspace) is the trusted one (which
> may well be correct on some vendor kernel branches), whereas upstream
> the kernel is the trusted one.
>
To clarify, this wasn't the phi
Ok, this has been something on my TODO list to write up for a little
while now.. but better late than never ;-)
At LPC Daniel Vetter and myself were talking to Greg Hackmann and came
to realize a bit of an impedance mismatch between how android display
stack expects to use fences, and what Daniel
