On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type
> patches laying in my build-dir.
>
> Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had successfully tested the backlight type
> patch [1] with an additional patch for radeon by Michel
The parent of the backlight doesn't let you determine whether it's a
platform or a firmware interface without heuristics. I'd prefer to
explicitly define that.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Hi,
while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type
patches laying in my build-dir.
Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had successfully tested the backlight type
patch [1] with an additional patch for radeon by Michel (posted to
dri-devel ML, see [2]).
The main patch needs a little
Hi Corentin,
? ??2010-10-27 ? 13:39 +0200?Corentin Chary ???
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Sedat Dilek
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type
> > patches laying in my build-dir.
> >
> > Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had successfully tested
Hi,
while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type
patches laying in my build-dir.
Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had successfully tested the backlight type
patch [1] with an additional patch for radeon by Michel (posted to
dri-devel ML, see [2]).
The main patch needs a little
Hi Corentin,
於 三，2010-10-27 於 13:39 +0200，Corentin Chary 提到：
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type
patches laying in my build-dir.
Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had
