Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] docs: Fix some broken references

2018-05-10 Thread Andrea Parri
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:18:52AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > As we move stuff around, some doc references are broken. Fix some of > them via this script: > ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check --fix-rst > > Manually checked if the produced result is valid, removing a few >

Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] docs: Fix some broken references

2018-05-10 Thread Andrea Parri
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:41:53PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 9 May 2018 15:11:07 -0400 (EDT) > Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> escreveu: > > > On Wed, 9 May 2018, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > > Em Wed, 9 May 2018 19:15:01

Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] docs: Fix some broken references

2018-05-10 Thread Andrea Parri
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 03:20:45PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 9 May 2018 19:15:01 +0200 > Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:18:52AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > As we move stuff around,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes

2018-06-15 Thread Andrea Parri
[...] > >>+ /* > >>+* wake_up_process() paired with set_current_state() inserts > >>+* sufficient barriers to make sure @owner either sees it's > >>+* wounded or has a wakeup pending to re-read the wounded > >>+* state. > >IIUC,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes

2018-06-15 Thread Andrea Parri
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 09:29:21AM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > The current Wound-Wait mutex algorithm is actually not Wound-Wait but > Wait-Die. Implement also Wound-Wait as a per-ww-class choice. Wound-Wait > is, contrary to Wait-Die a preemptive algorithm and is known to

Re: [PATCH v1 12/22] docs: driver-api: add .rst files from the main dir

2019-06-19 Thread Andrea Parri
> rename Documentation/{ => driver-api}/atomic_bitops.rst (99%) Same here: NAK, this document does not belong to driver-api. I also realize that, despite previous notices, you keep touching documentation without even CC-ing the people who care... Andrea

Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/msm: Fix improper uses of smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()

2019-05-09 Thread Andrea Parri
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:14:57PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > These barriers only apply to the read-modify-write operations; in > particular, they do not apply to the atomic_set() primitive. > > Replace the barriers with smp_mb()s. > > Fixes: b1fc2839d2f92 ("drm/ms

[PATCH 1/4] drm/msm: Fix improper uses of smp_mb__{before, after}_atomic()

2019-05-22 Thread Andrea Parri
aul E. McKenney" Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri Cc: Rob Clark Cc: Sean Paul Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jordan Crouse Cc: linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: freedr...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Paul E. McKe

[PATCH 1/5] drm/msm: Fix improper uses of smp_mb__{before, after}_atomic()

2019-04-30 Thread Andrea Parri
aul E. McKenney" Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri Cc: Rob Clark Cc: Sean Paul Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jordan Crouse Cc: linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: freedr...@lists.freedesktop.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adren

Re: [PATCH v2] hv: account for packet descriptor in maximum packet size

2022-01-10 Thread Andrea Parri
lloc rounds them up anyway. > > Fixes: adae1e931acd ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Copy packets sent by Hyper-V out of > the ring buffer") > Suggested-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) > Signed-off-by: Yanming Liu Thanks for sorting this out; the patch looks good to me: Reviewed-

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove support for Hyper-V 2008 and 2008R2/Win7

2022-05-04 Thread Andrea Parri
t; Michael Kelley (4): > Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove support for Hyper-V 2008 and Hyper-V > 2008R2/Win7 > scsi: storvsc: Remove support for Hyper-V 2008 and 2008R2/Win7 > video: hyperv_fb: Remove support for Hyper-V 2008 and 2008R2/Win7 > drm/hyperv: Remove support for Hyper-V 200