On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 04:31:54 Rob Clark wrote:
+ - int (*firstopen) (struct drm_device *)
+ - void (*lastclose) (struct drm_device *)
+ - int (*open) (struct drm_device *, struct
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Andy Gross andy.gr...@ti.com wrote:
Register OMAP DRM/KMS platform device. DMM is split into a
separate device using hwmod.
Signed-off-by: Andy Gross andy.gr...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
There can be scenarios, especially when re-importing an existing buffer,
where you end up with multiple 'struct omap_bo's wrapping a single GEM
object handle. Which causes badness when the first of the evil-clones
is omap_bo_del()'d.
To do this, introduce reference
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Inki Dae inki@samsung.com wrote:
exported gem buffer into dmabuf should be released when a gem relese is
requested by user. with dma_buf_put() call, if file-f_count is 0 then
a release callback of exynos gem module(exporter) will be called to release
its
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use tiled buffers for rotated/reflected scanout, with CRTC and plane
properties as the interface for userspace to configure rotation.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c | 17 +
drivers/staging/omapdrm
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use tiled buffers for rotated/reflected scanout, with CRTC and plane
properties as the interface for userspace to configure rotation.
btw, I assume the potential controversial part of the patch
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:06:26AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use tiled buffers for rotated/reflected scanout, with CRTC and plane
properties as the interface for userspace to configure rotation.
Signed
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Update TODO file, which had been neglected.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/TODO |7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/TODO b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/TODO
index 55b1837
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 09:06 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use tiled buffers for rotated/reflected scanout, with CRTC and plane
properties as the interface for userspace to configure rotation
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
A dma-fence can be attached to a buffer which is being filled or consumed
by hw, to allow userspace to pass the buffer without waiting to another
device. For example, userspace can call page_flip ioctl to display the
next frame of graphics after kicking the GPU
oh, btw, this should be an [RFC]
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
A dma-fence can be attached to a buffer which is being filled or consumed
by hw, to allow userspace to pass the buffer without waiting to another
device
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 12-07-12 00:29, Rob Clark schreef:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
A dma-fence can be attached to a buffer which is being filled or consumed
by hw, to allow userspace to pass the buffer without waiting to another
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
A dma-fence can be attached to a buffer which is being filled or consumed
by hw, to allow userspace to pass the buffer without waiting to another
device. For example, userspace can call page_flip ioctl to display the
next frame of graphics after kicking the GPU
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Tom Cooksey tom.cook...@arm.com wrote:
My other thought is around atomicity. Could this be extended to
(safely) allow for hardware devices which might want to access
multiple buffers simultaneously? I think it probably can with
some tweaks to the interface? An
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankho...@canonical.com wrote:
Hey,
Op 13-07-12 20:52, Rob Clark schreef:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Tom Cooksey tom.cook...@arm.com wrote:
My other thought is around atomicity. Could this be extended to
(safely) allow
will as usual be appreciated, and acks will
be even more welcome (I've been working on this document for longer than I
feel comfortable with).
btw, thanks for this!
One minor typo below.. with that,
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl b
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Re-sending first patch, with a wider audience. Apparently I didn't
spam enough inboxes the first time.
And, at Daniel Vetter's suggestion, adding some helper functions in
dma-buf to get the most restrictive parameters of all the attached
devices.
Rob Clark (2
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
For devices which have constraints about maximum number of segments
in an sglist. For example, a device which could only deal with
contiguous buffers would set max_segment_count to 1.
The initial motivation is for devices sharing buffers via dma-buf,
to allow
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Add some helpers to iterate through all attachers and get the most
restrictive segment size/count/boundary.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 63 +++
include/linux/dma-buf.h | 19
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've enhanced the modetest utility to test various features of the SH Mobile
LCDC DRM driver. Here are the corresponding patches. They mostly touch buffer
allocation cleanup (1/7), adding
to the cleanup of moving
dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask into dma_parms, I'll do this first.
So anyways, don't consider this patch yet for inclusion, I'll make an
updated one based on dma_parms..
BR,
-R
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Cooper Yuan coopery...@gmail.com wrote:
implement mmap function of dma_buf_ops.
Signed-off-by: Cooper Yuan coopery...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 38
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, InKi Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
index 913a23e..805b344 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
+++
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Friday 20 July 2012 10:34:46 Rob Clark wrote:
thanks! I've pushed to a branch on my github tree, in case you want
to double check that I'm not missing anything:
git://github.com
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
The GEM handle takes the reference. If a driver is actually importing a
foreign dmabuf, rather than just re-importing it's own dmabuf, it needs
to do a get_dma_buf().
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c|7
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger remaining
issues in the TODO before moving omapdrm out of staging.
The biggest place that this shows up is in GO bit handling. Basically
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Not very clean, just for proof of concept.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c |4 ++-
drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c | 76 ++-
drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h |2 ++
drivers/video
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
We need this so that platform_get_irq() works when drm core sets up the
irq handling.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/drm.c | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This is still work in progress, but it nicely solves the omapdss vs drm
impedence mismatches, and properly fixes unpin confusion vs GO bit status.
As an added bonus, we also no longer leave the last overlay buffer pinned.
Adding the previously missing vblank event
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
For that matter, wouldn't it be useful to support exporting a userptr
buffer
at some point in the future?
Shouldn't USERPTR usage be discouraged once we get dma-buf support ?
Why? It's perfectly fine to use it and
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net wrote:
Le mardi 31 juillet 2012 14:56:14 Laurent Pinchart, vous avez écrit :
For that matter, wouldn't it be useful to support exporting a userptr
buffer at some point in the future?
Shouldn't USERPTR usage be discouraged
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:07 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
I've been working for the better part of the week on solving some of
the omapdss vs kms mismatches, which is one of the bigger
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This simplifies drm fb lifetime, and if the crtc/plane needs to hold
a ref to the fb when disabling a pipe until the next vblank, this
avoids the need to make disabling an overlay synchronous. This is a
problem that shows up when userspace is using a drm plane
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:20:21 -0500, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This simplifies drm fb lifetime, and if the crtc/plane needs to hold
a ref to the fb when disabling a pipe until
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:41:28 -0500, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:20:21 -0500, Rob Clark rob.cl
, the callback
for reclaim_buffers is removed from omapdrm.
Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra cmahapa...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
b/drivers
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:28:29PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:41:28 -0500, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com
wrote:
It's not really about being friendly. Omapdss tries to do as little as
possible
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Archit Taneja arc...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 09:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Archit Taneja arc...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 07:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2012
support
and so the callback for reclaim_buffers is being removed from omapdrm.
Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra cmahapa...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:53 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
Ok.. this would help. I'll take a look. I do request that
interfaces/panels don't set any mgr/timing related registers. I had
to comment all this stuff out in my
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
I guess the fact is that DRM concepts do not really match the OMAP DSS
hardware
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:25 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Tomi
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Semwal, Sumit sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Rob, Tomi,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:45 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Thu
:
warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Andy Gross andy.gr...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Andy Gross andy.gr...@ti.com wrote:
Removed the unnecessary copy of the memory page addresses when
programming the DMM/PAT and all support code for the lut copy.
The original intent was to have this code in place for
suspend/resume functionality w.r.t.
/dma-fence.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..93448e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/base/dma-fence.c
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+/*
+ * Fence mechanism for dma-buf to allow for asynchronous dma access
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Texas Instruments
+ * Author: Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
back to when it was a user
configurable option, rather than something select'd by drivers using
dmabuf, and we just never went back to clean up. Let's drop the
fallbacks.
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
+
+/**
+ * dma_fence_wait - wait for a fence to be signaled
+ *
+ * @fence: [in]The fence to wait on
+ * @intr:[in]if true, do an interruptible wait
+ * @timeout: [in]absolute time for timeout, in
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Re-sending the earlier rotation property patch, plus Andre's z-order
property patch rebased on latest staging-next.
Andre Renaud (1):
Expose the OMAP Z-Order property through DRM
Rob Clark (1):
staging: drm/omap: add rotation properties
drivers/staging/omapdrm
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use tiled buffers for rotated/reflected scanout, with CRTC and plane
properties as the interface for userspace to configure rotation.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c | 10 +++
drivers/staging/omapdrm
From: Andre Renaud an...@bluewatersys.com
Added support for zorder changes through DRM plane properties
Signed-off-by: Andre Renaud an...@bluewatersys.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_drv.h |1 +
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 19
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 03:18:02PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Andre Renaud an...@bluewatersys.com
Added support for zorder changes through DRM plane properties
Signed-off-by: Andre Renaud
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:24 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
First draft.
The ioctl simply takes a list of object IDs and property IDs and their
values. For setting values to blob properties, the property value
indicates the length
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:47:13PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:24 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
First draft.
The ioctl simply takes
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, nuclear-pageflip would be associated only w/ a single crtc.
Actually I was kinda assuming atomic-modeset was too.. ie. moving a
plane from one crtc
From time to time I've been getting questions about how to use gl/egl
without x11. And I would point them at Jesse's blog post:
http://virtuousgeek.org/blog/index.php/jbarnes/2011/10/31/writing_stanalone_programs_with_egl_and_
But I wanted some simple example that was updated to work w/ the
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
For drivers that can support rotated scanout, the extra parameter
checking in drm-core, while nice, tends to get confused. To solve
this drivers can set the crtc or plane invert_dimensions field so
that the dimension checking takes into account the rotation
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
If rotated 90 or 270, we need to invert the dimensions used by drm
core for calculating if the dimensions of an attached fb are correct.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff
Dave, I just noticed that I still have this patch locally, but don't
see it in drm-next.. so just checking that it didn't get forgotten
BR,
-R
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 15 ---
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
index 7ba9b39..a82e0a2 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
+++ b/include/drm
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Since the plane hasn't yet taken a reference, we need to hold a
reference while waiting to ensure the backing GEM bo doesn't get
freed from under us.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c | 16 ++--
1 file changed
oh.. and this should be a 1/1 (no 2nd part.. apparently I suck at
git-format-patch)
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 15 ---
1 file changed, 15
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This simplifies drm fb lifetime, and if the crtc/plane needs to hold
a ref to the fb when disabling a pipe until the next vblank, this
avoids the need to make disabling an overlay synchronous. This is a
problem that shows up when userspace is using a drm plane
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 05:32:21PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
Dave, I just noticed that I still have this patch locally, but don't
see it in drm-next.. so just checking that it didn't get forgotten
My locking fixes blew up
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:53:44AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
This patch is for introducing the irq thread support in drm_irq.
Why we need irq thread in drm_irq code?
In our GPU system, the gpu interrupt handler need some
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This simplifies drm fb lifetime, and if the crtc/plane needs to hold
a ref to the fb when disabling a pipe until the next vblank, this
avoids the need to make disabling an overlay synchronous. This is a
problem that shows up when userspace is using a drm plane
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This simplifies drm fb lifetime, and if the crtc/plane needs to hold
a ref to the fb when disabling a pipe until the next vblank, this
avoids the need to make disabling an overlay synchronous
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This simplifies drm fb lifetime, and if the crtc/plane needs to hold
a ref to the fb when disabling a pipe until the next vblank, this
avoids the need to make disabling an overlay synchronous. This is a
problem that shows up when userspace is using a drm plane
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
'struct omap_video_timings' was updated w/ a 'bool interlaced'. Without
a matching update in omap_connector, this field could have undefined
values from the stack, which isn't quite ideal.
Update the fxns to convert omapdss-drm timings structs, and zero-init
'struct
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Without these, DVI is broken.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added these fields, as
well as the interlaced field, where merged in Linux 3.5-rc5. So I
think both this and the 'update for interlaced' patch
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
It isn't used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c |2 --
include/drm/drm_crtc.h |1 -
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
index 7552675..21a0a85
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
It isn't used anywhere.
duh, nevermind.. I figured out how it is used. But maybe I'll add a comment.
BR,
-R
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c |2
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This is following a bit the approach that Ville is taking for atomic-
modeset, in that it is switching over to using properties for everything.
The advantage of this approach is that it makes it easier to add new
attributes to set as part of a page-flip (and even opens
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
The 'atomic' mechanism allows for multiple properties to be updated,
checked, and commited atomically. This will be the basis of atomic-
modeset and nuclear-pageflip.
The basic flow is:
state = dev-atomic_begin();
for (... one or more ...)
obj
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
An object property is an id (idr) for a drm mode object. This
will allow a property to be used set/get a framebuffer, CRTC, etc.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 28
include/drm/drm_crtc.h |5 +
include/drm/drm_mode.h
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This indicates to userspace that the property is something that can
be set dynamically without requiring a test step to check if the
hw is capable. This allows a userspace compositor, such as weston,
to avoid an extra ioctl to check whether it needs to fall-back
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use atomic properties mechanism to set plane attributes. This by
itself doesn't accomplish anything, but it avoids having multiple
code paths to do the same thing when nuclear-pageflip and atomic-
modeset are introduced.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 270
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Break the mutable state of a plane out into a separate structure.
This makes it easier to have some helpers for plane-set_property()
and for checking for invalid params. The idea is that individual
drivers can wrap the state struct in their own struct which adds
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Use atomic properties mechanism for CRTC page_flip. This by itself
doesn't accomplish anything, but it avoids having multiple code
paths to do the same thing when nuclear-pageflip and atomic-modeset
are introduced.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 59
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Start breaking out the mutable state of the CRTC into it's own
structure. Plus add _check_state() and _set_property() helpers.
This only moves the state that is related to scanout fb, which
is needed for nuclear-pageflip. The rest of the mutable state
should be moved
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 147 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c |1 +
include/drm/drm.h |2 +
include/drm/drm_crtc.h |2 +
include/drm/drm_mode.h | 38
5 files changed, 161
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/Makefile |1 +
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_atomic.c | 270 +
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_atomic.h | 52 +++
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_crtc.c | 247
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This is following a bit the approach that Ville is taking for atomic-
modeset, in that it is switching over to using properties for everything.
The advantage of this approach is that it makes
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 12:59 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Without these, DVI is broken.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
Greg, it looks like the omapdss changes which added
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:19:59 -0500
Rob Clark r...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This is following a bit the approach that Ville
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:07:49PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:19:59 -0500
Rob Clark r...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:30:18AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:07:49PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:28:43AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:30:18AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:42:27AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:28:43AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:23:48AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:42:27AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:03:14 -0500
Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
The 'atomic' mechanism allows for multiple properties to be updated,
checked, and commited atomically
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:03:14 -0500
Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:00:19PM -0500, Clark, Rob wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:48:16AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:35:01 -0500
Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:03:14 -0500
Rob Clark rob.cl
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Previously read-only KMS ioctls had some somewhat inconsistent settings
regarding whether mastership was required. For example, GETRESOURCES
did not require master, but GETPLANERESOURCES, GETPROPERTY, etc. did.
At least for debugging, it is nice to be able to use
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
The 'atomic' mechanism allows for multiple properties to be updated,
checked, and commited atomically. This will be the basis of atomic-
modeset and nuclear-pageflip.
The basic flow is:
state = dev-atomic_begin();
for (... one or more ...)
obj
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This is following a bit the approach that Ville is taking for atomic-
modeset, in that it is switching over to using properties for everything.
The advantage of this approach is that it makes it easier to add new
attributes to set as part of a page-flip (and even opens
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
An object property is an id (idr) for a drm mode object. This
will allow a property to be used set/get a framebuffer, CRTC, etc.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 35 ++-
include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 10 ++
include/drm
301 - 400 of 5736 matches
Mail list logo
