https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202555
Evgeny Kurnevsky (kurnev...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|No |Yes
--
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #7 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
kmemleak is claiming there are leaks all over the place. That's weird, since
other people (including myself) aren't seeing any such leaks, also with 4.20
based kernels.
So, I'm afraid thi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Steinhauser (li...@bernd-steinhauser.de) ---
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #7)
> kmemleak is claiming there are leaks all over the place. That's weird, since
> other people (including myself) aren't seeing any s
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202511
--- Comment #13 from Michael A. Leonetti (mikealeone...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 281107
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=281107&action=edit
bisect log 2
I'm not sure if this is helpful. Basically all of the builds that
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #10 from Bernd Steinhauser (li...@bernd-steinhauser.de) ---
Unfortunately this turns out to be much harder than expected, because about 1/3
of the revs to test just won't boot at all (like instant kernel panic and not
responding).
This
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202511
--- Comment #14 from Michael A. Leonetti (mikealeone...@gmail.com) ---
Is there anything else I can try? Should I do the first bisect again?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202511
--- Comment #15 from Bjorn Helgaas (bhelg...@google.com) ---
Created attachment 281143
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=281143&action=edit
per-cpu alloc debug patch
I think bisecting again would be a poor use of your time unles
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Steinhauser (li...@bernd-steinhauser.de) ---
Ok, so finally I think I've been able to track this down.
Not 100% sure, because for the final test versions I had to apply a few patches
to fix bugs that otherwise would've p
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
Christian König (christian.koe...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian.koe
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Steinhauser (li...@bernd-steinhauser.de) ---
meh …
well, I just tested 4.20.10 and I do still see a lot of memory leaks there.
kmemleak: 93 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
And it looks an aw
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #14 from Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) ---
Hi. Testing Linux 5.0-rc6 for some minutes, I am not seeing these kmemleak
messages anymore on the MSI Mortar B350M. Bernd, could you test this?
Unfortunately, the c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #15 from Bernd Steinhauser (li...@bernd-steinhauser.de) ---
Sure, can test that one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202537
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Steinhauser (li...@bernd-steinhauser.de) ---
Created attachment 281177
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=281177&action=edit
kmemleak output with 5.0-rc6
Nope sorry, I see the same with kernel 5.0-rc6.
14 matches
Mail list logo
