On 18.04.24 21:43, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2024-03-07 01:29, Wayne Lin wrote:
>> [Why]
>> Commit:
>> - commit 5aa1dfcdf0a4 ("drm/mst: Refactor the flow for payload
>> allocation/removement")
>> accidently overwrite the commit
>> - commit 54d217406afe ("drm: use mgr->dev in drm_dbg_kms in
>>
On 08.05.24 14:35, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> On 2024-05-07 07:04, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 06.05.24 16:30, David Wang wrote:
>>>> On 30.04.24 08:13, David Wang wrote:
>>
>>>> And confirmed that the warning is caused by
>&g
On 06.05.24 16:30, David Wang wrote:
>> On 30.04.24 08:13, David Wang wrote:
>> And confirmed that the warning is caused by
>> 07ed11afb68d94eadd4ffc082b97c2331307c5ea and reverting it can fix.
>
> The kernel warning still shows up in 6.9.0-rc7.
> (I think 4 high load processes on a 2-Core VM
On 29.04.24 17:06, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following build warnings / errors noticed on Linux next-20240429 tag on the
> arm64, arm and riscv with gcc-8 and gcc-13 builds pass.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing
>
> Commit id:
> b58a0bc904ff nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM
[Adding a few folks and list while dropping the stable list, as this is
unrelated to it]
On 31.03.24 07:59, Andrei Gaponenko wrote:
>
> I noticed a regression with the mailine kernel pre-compiled by EPEL.
> I have just tried linux-6.9-rc1.tar.gz from kernel.org, and it still
> misbehaves.
>
>
On 08.03.24 02:08, Alex Constantino wrote:
> Fix OOM scenario by doing multiple notifications to the OOM handler through
> a busy wait logic.
> Changes from commit 5a838e5d5825 ("drm/qxl: simplify qxl_fence_wait") would
> result in a '[TTM] Buffer eviction failed' exception whenever it reached a
>
On 11.03.24 17:09, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 09:24:59PM +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Sorry for the delay.
Happens, thx for looking onto this!
>> The following trace occurs when using nouveau and unplugging a DP MST
>> adaptor:
> [...]
>> +if (bpp_x16 == 0)
>> +
On 07.03.24 18:58, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Chris Bainbridge
> -
>
> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:24:59 +
Hmm, it looks like nobody is looking into this regression. Is there a
good reason?
Imre, or did you maybe just miss that Chris' regression seems to be
On 29.02.24 20:04, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> This is the main pull for v6.9, description below.
>
> [...]
>
> GPU:
> - fix sc7180 UBWC config
Why was that queued for 6.9? That is a fix for a 6.8 regression that for
untrained eyes like mine does not look overly dangerous (but of course I
might be
[adding a bunch of list and people as well as Timur Tabi, who authored
the culprit]
Sid Pranjale, thx for the report. FWIW, I'm just replying to add this to
the regression tracking to ensure it does not fall through the cracks.
Nevertheless let me mention two things while at it:
On 29.02.24
On 13.02.24 19:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> I do agree that pm runtime eDP driver got merged that time but I think
> the issue is either a combination of that along with DRM aux bridge
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/122584/ OR just the latter as
> even that
On 27.01.24 14:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> In Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/1061449) we got the following
> quotred report:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 07:38:16PM +0100, Patrice Duroux wrote:
>>
>> Giving a try to 6.7, here is a message extracted from dmesg:
>> [4.177226]
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
Gerd, it seems this regression[1] fell through the cracks. Could you
please take a look? Or is there a good reason why this can't be
addressed? Or was it dealt with and I
On 21.11.23 19:50, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> On 11/21/2023 9:57 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 15.11.23 19:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>> On 11/15/2023 12:06 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:23:10PM +0300, Dmitr
On 15.11.23 19:06, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> On 11/15/2023 12:06 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:23:10PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> While developing and testing the commit bfcc3d8f94f4 ("drm/msm/dp:
>>> support setting the DP subconnector type") I had the patch [1] in my
On 15.11.23 07:19, Owen T. Heisler wrote:
> On 10/31/23 04:18, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 28.10.23 04:46, Owen T. Heisler wrote:
>>> #regzbot introduced: d386a4b54607cf6f76e23815c2c9a3abc1d66882
>>> #regzbot link: https://gitlab.freedeskt
On 19.11.23 14:24, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:47:01PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On 12.11.23 01:46, Phillip Susi wrote:
I had been testing some things on a post 6.6-rc5 kernel for a week or
two and then when I pulled to a post 6.6 release kernel, I found that
Lo!
On 12.11.23 01:46, Phillip Susi wrote:
> I had been testing some things on a post 6.6-rc5 kernel for a week or
> two and then when I pulled to a post 6.6 release kernel, I found that
> system suspend was broken. It seems that the radeon driver failed to
> suspend, leaving the display dead,
t 09:27:02AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:31 PM Huacai Chen
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:15 PM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
>>>>>>>>>
On 09.10.23 10:54, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:45 PM Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:27:02AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:31 PM Huacai Chen wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:15 PM Linux
[CCing the regression list, as it should be in the loop for regressions:
https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html]
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker.
On 13.09.23 14:02, Jaak Ristioja wrote:
>
> Upgrading to Linux 6.5 on a Lenovo ThinkPad L570
On 11.08.23 20:10, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
> On 2023-08-11 at 08:45 +02, Thorsten Leemhuis
> wrote:
>> On 10.08.23 21:33, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
>>> The following is a copy an issue I posted to drm/i915 gitlab [1] two
>>> months ago. I repost it to the mailing lists in hope that it will help
>>>
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
What's the status wrt to this regression (caused by 8ddce13ae69 from
Marek)? It looks like things are stalled and the regression still is
unresolved, but I ask because I
On 10.07.23 10:12, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On 06/07/2023 15:03, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 06.07.23 11:58, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>>> Aspeed always report the display port as "connected", because it
>>> doesn't set a .detec
[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 05.07.23 06:45, Amit Pundir wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul
On 06.07.23 11:58, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> Aspeed always report the display port as "connected", because it
> doesn't set a .detect callback.
> Fix this by providing the proper detect callback for astdp and dp501.
>
> This also fixes the following regression:
> Since commit fae7d186403e
On 16.04.23 14:34, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:55:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Since commit 241d2fb56a18 ("of: Make OF framebuffer device names unique"),
>> as spotted by Frédéric Bonnard, the historical "of-display" device is
>> gone: the updated logic
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
Was a proper solution for the regression the initial mail in this thread
is about ever found? Doesn't look like it for here, but maybe I'm
missing something.
Reminder, the
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
Dmitry, was any progress made to address this regression? Doesn't look
like it, but I strongly suspect I'm missing something, as I'm not really
sure if I properly understood
Hi!
On 10.05.23 10:26, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
> I noticed a regression report on Bugzilla ([1]). As many developers don't
> have a look on it, I decided to forward it by email. See the report
> for the full thread.
>
> Quoting from the report:
>
>> Azamat S. Kalimoulline 2021-04-06 15:45:08
On 02.05.23 15:48, Felix Richter wrote:
> On 5/2/23 15:34, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>> On 02.05.23 15:13, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 7:45 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
>>> Leemhuis) wrote:
>>>
>>
On 02.05.23 15:13, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 7:45 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) wrote:
>
>> On 30.04.23 13:44, Felix Richter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am running into an issue with the integrated GPU of the Ryzen
[CCing the regression list, as it should be in the loop for regressions:
https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html]
[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have
On 20.04.23 17:57, Pierre Asselin wrote:
> Some legacy BIOSes report no reserved bits in their 32-bit rgb mode,
> breaking the calculation of bits_per_pixel in commit f35cd3fa7729
> ("firmware/sysfb: Fix EFI/VESA format selection"). However they report
> lfb_depth correctly for those modes. Keep
;> On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 1:22 PM Chris Clayton
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 15/02/2023 11:09, Karol Herbs
On 10.02.23 20:01, Karol Herbst wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 7:35 PM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) wrote:
>>
>> On 08.02.23 09:48, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm assuming that we are not going to see a fix for this regression before
&g
On 08.02.23 09:48, Chris Clayton wrote:
>
> I'm assuming that we are not going to see a fix for this regression before
> 6.2 is released.
Yeah, looks like it. That's unfortunate, but happens. But there is still
time to fix it and there is one thing I wonder:
Did any of the nouveau developers
37 matches
Mail list logo
