Hi.
On 15/04/11 16:11, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>>> Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm"
>>> to everyone, but then chose to CC Ma
Hi.
On 15/04/11 16:11, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>>> Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm"
>>> to everyone, but then chose to CC Ma
Hi.
On 05/10/10 12:51, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Nigel Cunningham
> wrote:
>> Running a kernel based on the Rafael's -next tree, under VMware, I get the
>> following oops while booting:
>
> Should already be fixed in Linus tree by,
>
12/0x26
This oops is caused by vmwgfx setting it's dev->devicename to a static char *
instead of kmallocing memory. The kfree that's done in drm_master_destroy then
explodes :)
Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmw
Hi.
On 05/10/10 12:51, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Running a kernel based on the Rafael's -next tree, under VMware, I get the
following oops while booting:
Should already be fixed in Linus tree by,
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kerne
12/0x26
This oops is caused by vmwgfx setting it's dev->devicename to a static char *
instead of kmallocing memory. The kfree that's done in drm_master_destroy then
explodes :)
Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmw
Hi again.
On 01/06/10 16:33, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Nigel Cunningham
> wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Just wondering if anyone else has tried to hibernate while using Radeon KMS
>> and a tree with Dave's post 2.6.34 patches? My 32 bi
Hi.
On 01/06/10 16:33, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Nigel Cunningham
> wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Just wondering if anyone else has tried to hibernate while using Radeon KMS
>> and a tree with Dave's post 2.6.34 patches? My 32 bit P4 base
Hi again.
On 01/06/10 16:33, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Nigel Cunningham
wrote:
Hi all.
Just wondering if anyone else has tried to hibernate while using Radeon KMS
and a tree with Dave's post 2.6.34 patches? My 32 bit P4 based system (with
an RV250 card) is ha
Hi.
On 01/06/10 16:33, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Nigel Cunningham
wrote:
Hi all.
Just wondering if anyone else has tried to hibernate while using Radeon KMS
and a tree with Dave's post 2.6.34 patches? My 32 bit P4 based system (with
an RV250 card) is hanging a
Hi.
On 25/05/10 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 07:17 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/24/10 06:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:53:51AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 05/24/10 05:56, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Won't this result in a behavioural
Hi.
On 25/05/10 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 07:17 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 05/24/10 06:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:53:51AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 05/24/10 05:56, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Won't this result in a behavioural difference? Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
