On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:07:58PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>
> > it looks like the beginning is the same, but then it just turns to all
> > ones at a random point (even *within* a byte).
>
> Looks like the EDID ROM is dropping off
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:57:15PM -0700, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wed October 10 2012 23:02:06 Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Alan Cox
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:56:32 -0700
> > > Robert Morell wrote:
> > >
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:57:15PM -0700, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Wed October 10 2012 23:02:06 Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:56:32 -0700
Robert Morell rmor...@nvidia.com wrote:
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for "an internal implementation
issue, and not really an interface". The dma-buf infrastructure is
explicitly intended as an interface between modules/drivers, so it
should use EXPORT_SYMBOL instead.
Signed-off-by: Robert Morell
---
This patc
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for an internal implementation
issue, and not really an interface. The dma-buf infrastructure is
explicitly intended as an interface between modules/drivers, so it
should use EXPORT_SYMBOL instead.
Signed-off-by: Robert Morell rmor...@nvidia.com
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:10:04AM -0800, Semwal, Sumit wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Robert Morell rmor...@nvidia.com wrote:
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for an internal implementation
issue, and not really an interface. The dma-buf infrastructure is
explicitly
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:10:04AM -0800, Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Robert Morell wrote:
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for "an internal implementation
> > issue, and not really an interface". ?The dma-buf infrastructure i
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:00:54AM -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ilija Hadzic
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> The problem is the x86 nvidia binary driver does sit outside of
> >> subsystems, and I forsee wanting to share buffers with it
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for "an internal implementation
issue, and not really an interface". The dma-buf infrastructure is
explicitly intended as an interface between modules/drivers, so it
should use EXPORT_SYMBOL instead.
Signed-off-by: Robert Morell
---
driver
The DMA buffer infrastructure (dma-buf) currently exposes its interface
with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. The documentation for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL says:
"It implies that the function is considered an internal
implementation issue, and not really an interface."
This interface is clearly not just an
The DMA buffer infrastructure (dma-buf) currently exposes its interface
with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. The documentation for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL says:
It implies that the function is considered an internal
implementation issue, and not really an interface.
This interface is clearly not just an
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for an internal implementation
issue, and not really an interface. The dma-buf infrastructure is
explicitly intended as an interface between modules/drivers, so it
should use EXPORT_SYMBOL instead.
Signed-off-by: Robert Morell rmor...@nvidia.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:10:02AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 12 December 2011, Robert Morell wrote:
> > >
> > > Doing a buffer sharing with something that is not GPL is not fun, as, if
> > > any
> > > issue rises there, it would b
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:10:02AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 12 December 2011, Robert Morell wrote:
Doing a buffer sharing with something that is not GPL is not fun, as, if
any
issue rises there, it would be impossible to discover if the problem is
either
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:13:06AM -0800, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On 09-12-2011 20:50, Robert Morell wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:18:48AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Friday 02 December 2011, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> >>> This is the first step in
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:13:06AM -0800, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 09-12-2011 20:50, Robert Morell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:18:48AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2011, Sumit Semwal wrote:
This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:18:48AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2011, Sumit Semwal wrote:
This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism.
[...]
+ return dmabuf;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_buf_export);
I agree with Konrad, this should definitely
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:18:48AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2011, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> > This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism.
>
[...]
>
> > + return dmabuf;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_buf_export);
>
> I agree with Konrad, this
18 matches
Mail list logo
