Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Allow DMA BUF heaps to be loaded as modules

2019-11-12 Thread Sandeep Patil
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:47:53AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:19 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:41 PM John Stultz wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Allow DMA BUF heaps to be loaded as modules

2019-11-12 Thread Sandeep Patil
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:41:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:43 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:57:44AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:58 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:48:32PM +, John

Re: [RFC v2 1/3] dma-buf: give each buffer a full-fledged inode

2019-03-24 Thread Sandeep Patil
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:02:55AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:51:33PM -0700, Chenbo Feng wrote: > > From: Greg Hackmann > > > > By traversing /proc/*/fd and /proc/*/map_files, processes with CAP_ADMIN > > can get a lot of fine-grained data about how shmem buffers

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] staging: ion: create one device entry per heap

2017-10-04 Thread Sandeep Patil
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:42:32PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 10/03/2017 09:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:07:48AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > >> Thinking about this a bit more, I'm not 100% sure if this > >> will allow the security rules we want. Heap ids are