Thanks for comments.
On 10/20/2016 2:15 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> IMO it would be better to use id->driver_data unconditionally and save a
>>> call to of_device_get_match_data()
>>> What would you suggest to move ahead?
>> I'd suggest using id->driver_data unconditionally, but I'd like Wolfram'
Hi Laurent,
On 10/19/2016 7:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jitendra,
>
> On Wednesday 19 Oct 2016 18:37:38 Sharma, Jitendra wrote:
>> On 10/19/2016 5:21 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 19 Oct 2016 17:12:48 Jitendra Sharma wrote:
>>>> Remove r
Hi Laurent,
On 10/19/2016 5:21 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jitendra,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday 19 Oct 2016 17:12:48 Jitendra Sharma wrote:
>> Remove redundant condition check
>> Remove not necessary if-else block for checking DT entry because else
>> part will never be pi
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for trying it out.
On 10/18/2016 6:37 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jitendra,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday 18 Oct 2016 15:39:58 Jitendra Sharma wrote:
>> Remove unused id_table entries
>> Currently this driver supports only device tree based configuration.
>>
