Question on S3 on evergreen
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:04 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Xavier Bestel > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 17:54 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: > >> [...] I have ported radeon_suspend_kms() and radeon_resume_kms() > >> functions from linux to CE. > > > > I imagine you already have checked with your company's lawyers, but if I > > understand correctly that means your drivers will be distributed under > > the GPL ? > > All the GPU driver code is licensed under MIT. Oh, I thought "linux" meant "kernel", not "X11". Xav
Question on S3 on evergreen
Hi, On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 17:54 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: > [...] I have ported radeon_suspend_kms() and radeon_resume_kms() > functions from linux to CE. I imagine you already have checked with your company's lawyers, but if I understand correctly that means your drivers will be distributed under the GPL ? Thanks, Xav
Re: Question on S3 on evergreen
Hi, On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 17:54 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: [...] I have ported radeon_suspend_kms() and radeon_resume_kms() functions from linux to CE. I imagine you already have checked with your company's lawyers, but if I understand correctly that means your drivers will be distributed under the GPL ? Thanks, Xav ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: Question on S3 on evergreen
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:04 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Xavier Bestel xavier.bes...@free.fr wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 17:54 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: [...] I have ported radeon_suspend_kms() and radeon_resume_kms() functions from linux to CE. I imagine you already have checked with your company's lawyers, but if I understand correctly that means your drivers will be distributed under the GPL ? All the GPU driver code is licensed under MIT. Oh, I thought linux meant kernel, not X11. Xav ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [git pull] drm fixes
Le vendredi 25 mars 2011 à 16:44 +0100, Peter Stuge a écrit : Michel Dänzer wrote: You won't have any trouble finding plenty of examples of newcomers having a better experience, as most of them thankfully don't come in with such a bad attitude and conduct. To a bystander it would seem that Ilija has great attitude and conduct. And to another bystander he looked a bit autistic. Xav ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Freescale Linux BSP review
Le mercredi 22 d?cembre 2010 ? 15:29 -0500, Nicolas Pitre a ?crit : > It is > not economically viable for the Open Source community to accommodate > proprietary drivers, irrespective of how loud you might advocate for > that. I think you can remove the word "economically" from your sentence (or replace it with e.g. "technically"), and it's all the more true. Xav
Re: Freescale Linux BSP review
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 15:29 -0500, Nicolas Pitre a écrit : It is not economically viable for the Open Source community to accommodate proprietary drivers, irrespective of how loud you might advocate for that. I think you can remove the word economically from your sentence (or replace it with e.g. technically), and it's all the more true. Xav ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Closed source userspace graphics drivers with an open source kernel component
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 19:07 +0700, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote: > Dave Airlie wrote: > > What potential? there are maybe 6 players on the ARM graphics scene > > > > ... > > Nvidia - well we know their position will never change. > > > Never say never. I have every reason to believe that Nvidia would > respond to market demand. Could you share those interesting reasons with us ? Xav
Re: Closed source userspace graphics drivers with an open source kernel component
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 19:07 +0700, C. Bergström wrote: Dave Airlie wrote: What potential? there are maybe 6 players on the ARM graphics scene ... Nvidia - well we know their position will never change. Never say never. I have every reason to believe that Nvidia would respond to market demand. Could you share those interesting reasons with us ? Xav ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
