On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:06:45PM -0300, Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> for struct with a huge list of elements.
>
> Keeping the arguments list inside the str
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 08:37:41AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:23:19 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > > I'm wondering if we need a kernel summit session on commenting
> > > conventions, markdown-in-kerneldoc, etc? Maybe I'll stick a proposal out
> > > there.
> >
>
On 08/03/2015 12:59 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/31/15 14:06, Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
>> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
>> for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
>> for struct with a huge list of elements.
>>
>> Keeping the
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:06:45 -0300
> Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
>
> > Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> > for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> > for struct with
On 07/31/15 14:06, Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> for struct with a huge list of elements.
>
> Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easie
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:23:19 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I'm wondering if we need a kernel summit session on commenting
> > conventions, markdown-in-kerneldoc, etc? Maybe I'll stick a proposal out
> > there.
>
> Might be useful, but I'm not sure how many people really would actively
> work
Hi Jon,
On Saturday 01 August 2015 13:22:10 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:06:45 -0300 Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
> > Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> > for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> > for struct with a
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:06:45 -0300
Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote:
> Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
> for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
> for struct with a huge list of elements.
>
> Keeping the arguments list inside the struct b
Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine
for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well
for struct with a huge list of elements.
Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easier
to maintain the documentation.
ie:
/**
* struct my_struct - s